There doesn't seem to be too many examples of this, which should tell you something.
I really tells me that schools don't suspend coaches who should be suspended. Hey, you notice there's not a peep in the national media about the whole Art Briles - Sam Uwachu incident? Steve Sarkisian - was he suspended for his drunk tirade? Nope.
I really tells me that schools don't suspend coaches who should be suspended. Hey, you notice there's not a peep in the national media about the whole Art Briles - Sam Uwachu incident? Steve Sarkisian - was he suspended for his drunk tirade? Nope.
What I mean is it doesn't go on and get rehashed. Seriously, what does rehashing Mike Rice stories have to do with Flood?Not a peep?? The Sarkisian story went on for days nationally
Steve Sarkisian - was he suspended for his drunk tirade? Nope.
Not sure anyone's saying that. The real question is why aren't other schools punishing their coaches? It's not as if they are being perfect angels. But somehow they just skate on by."But they did something worse! Therefore, we shouldn't have to be punished!"
I'm sure there's a clause somewhere about conduct unbecoming a figurehead. Who's going to tell me that doesn't deserve a suspension?Does USC have a regulation against making an ass out of yourself or using the F bomb?
Oh here's one - Bobby Petrino was suspended by Arkansas before they fired him.