Women out
- Thread starter hoquat63
- Start date
- Status
One thing you can assured of, if there's a benefit of the doubt to be given (selection/seeding/game site) Stringer will NOT get it from the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee. Never has.
lost 9 of 12...yes by metrics rpi of 40, highest left out they should be in but they have no one to blame but themselves...finished 7-9 in the Big 10 and lost to 175 Northwestern the last regular season game.
Like Hobbs a lot but him giving CVS an extension is worse than Steve giving scholarships to Bullock and Souf.
Let’s get 1000. The quicker we get there, the quicker CVS is gone.
Does the Women's Tournament have a different criteria than the Men's because "last 10" and how you finish wasn't supposed to be a criteria for the Men? Also Conference record was never supposed to be a criteria for the Men because they were supposed to look at your whole body of work and all of your games. As long as I've been following the Men's Tournament the committee ALWAYS said that about conference records.
"Some of the things that we thought were their 3-7 record in their last 10 games, as well as their ninth-place finish in the Big Ten standing," NCAA Tournament committee Rhonda Lundin Bennett said on a teleconference Monday evening in breaking down why Rutgers did not get in. "Those bad losses they had as well were what differentiated them. Those were Washington State and Northwestern."
https://www.app.com/story/sports/co...sketball-rutgers-womens-basketball/416950002/
"Some of the things that we thought were their 3-7 record in their last 10 games, as well as their ninth-place finish in the Big Ten standing," NCAA Tournament committee Rhonda Lundin Bennett said on a teleconference Monday evening in breaking down why Rutgers did not get in. "Those bad losses they had as well were what differentiated them. Those were Washington State and Northwestern."
https://www.app.com/story/sports/co...sketball-rutgers-womens-basketball/416950002/
Yes.
Oklahoma got the women in too...with only 16 wins and the that woman said because they played #2 schedule. But went 1 and 8 in those games. Like there is that much difference between #2 and Rutgers @ #16 toughest.
I guess playing tough schedule matters but winning any of them doesn't..unless you're RU of course.
We didn't deserve it..fine..but Oklahoma doesnt either..utter BS.
And her deals calls for her to get paid the full amount of her contract no matter how she leaves (resigns/fired) so it's not like Rutgers would save a dime if she stepped down tomorrow.
Hobbs loves the extension route. Don't understand it. It will cost the University lots of cash down the road.
Oklahoma getting in (both men’s and women’s) was complete BS. Are they paying slection committee memebers too?
- Status
