No NJ.com article of FDU game

[We Are RU]

c'mon man!

 

[Sideline20]

There were not enough negatives for Rutgers basketball to warrant a story. It would not have fit the agenda / narrative that NJ.com portrays.

If we had lost there would have been a 3 part series on the game.

 

[LC-88]

We scored too many points. They can't count that high.

 

[ScarletRunner]

Noticed that too.

Coverage of the heisman race, NJ high school recruits on other teams, etc. on the RU sports page, but not even a basic recap of the FDU game.

 

[fbc1866]

Get used to it, the sky stop falling in Piscataway. Nothing to report.

 

[koleszar]

There were not enough negatives for Rutgers basketball to warrant a story. It would not have fit the agenda / narrative that NJ.com portrays.

If we had lost there would have been a 3 part series on the game.

You got me with the "3 part series"[laughing]. It's so true. You would get, "What's wrong with RU basketball", "Is Steve Pikiell the answer", then "A rehash of RU Basketball's woe's: The Mike Rice Story". Because no story would be complete without rehashing the Mike Rice era for nj.com.