Maybe RU doesn’t blow the lead if Mag is in
Willard Postgame Press Conference Today
- Thread starter NiTeKnight
- Start date
There's a weird flowery, sing-songy vibe to ChatGPT that you can sniff out. I'm sure things like this will get better over time. It can still be useful and save time if people are willing to put the work into to edit and customize.
💯 definitely need that condescending mansplaining tone to truly capture it
Oh he for sure is. Maybe you're thinking about freshman Oskar
Oskar is currently a very willing, but not necessarily able, defender
Whoever coined the term Hawksplain was spot on.
The team is 2nd in all of CBB in whatever measures defensive efficiency. I am pretty certain that the staff puts together an excellent game plan, scouting and then all 5 players go out and execute.
If fans want to believe that is primarily because of Mag, great.....keep in mind we have Cliff anchoring the defense, very good on the ball guards and now have a 3rd one in JWill.
I also think (or know) that if you lose the Defensive Player of the Year (Caleb McConnell) and the defense remains at a high level, the constant between both seasons, is Cliff as an interior problem for teams to deal with....and now Ogbole backs him, which clearly is a big difference vs asking Wolf to be that player.
I also know that every CBB values pieces that defend 1 to 5 and plenty of rosters in CBB have pieces like that.....Illinois has Coleman Hawkins, Sparty has players, Illinois has athletes, as do a bunch of other successful CBB programs.
To me, last year, the staff took way too long to plug Simpson into the lineup and give RU offense, to offset Mag going down....Keep in mind we had Caleb and Cliff already on the floor as elite defenders. The team needed offense.
Right now, do I think being 2nd in defense and 300+ in offense makes sense?? I don't but we probably wouldn't be 300th if JWill played all season. And we won't be 300th, if Mag scores and defends. Mag scoring brings him into discussions as a more complete player like Coleman Hawkins and lots of others.
My last point is to keep in mind, the staff has recruited 2 very similar athletes and players like Mag in 2024. Will these 2 players ask for or require a ton of NIL money as freshman...?? I wouldn't intentionally ignore the staff "covering themselves", by having options with the same traits and skills that Mag brings to the table. Obviously you want each player to stay, and not lose the experience factor. I'd rather have Mag, Bailey, Dortch and Dylan Grant all on next year's roster, but in today's NIL environment, you have to protect yourself as well.
If fans want to believe that is primarily because of Mag, great.....keep in mind we have Cliff anchoring the defense, very good on the ball guards and now have a 3rd one in JWill.
I also think (or know) that if you lose the Defensive Player of the Year (Caleb McConnell) and the defense remains at a high level, the constant between both seasons, is Cliff as an interior problem for teams to deal with....and now Ogbole backs him, which clearly is a big difference vs asking Wolf to be that player.
I also know that every CBB values pieces that defend 1 to 5 and plenty of rosters in CBB have pieces like that.....Illinois has Coleman Hawkins, Sparty has players, Illinois has athletes, as do a bunch of other successful CBB programs.
To me, last year, the staff took way too long to plug Simpson into the lineup and give RU offense, to offset Mag going down....Keep in mind we had Caleb and Cliff already on the floor as elite defenders. The team needed offense.
Right now, do I think being 2nd in defense and 300+ in offense makes sense?? I don't but we probably wouldn't be 300th if JWill played all season. And we won't be 300th, if Mag scores and defends. Mag scoring brings him into discussions as a more complete player like Coleman Hawkins and lots of others.
My last point is to keep in mind, the staff has recruited 2 very similar athletes and players like Mag in 2024. Will these 2 players ask for or require a ton of NIL money as freshman...?? I wouldn't intentionally ignore the staff "covering themselves", by having options with the same traits and skills that Mag brings to the table. Obviously you want each player to stay, and not lose the experience factor. I'd rather have Mag, Bailey, Dortch and Dylan Grant all on next year's roster, but in today's NIL environment, you have to protect yourself as well.
Stopped reading after first paragraph because you are WRONG and will never admit it.
Wrong about Mag and wrong about Cam.
And not just a little wrong, like trying to get to ShopRite down the street and ending up in California wrong!
You forgot to add that he is not the reason why RU missed the NCAAs last year despite the team collapsing without him. 😆
Last edited:
A year ago this week, Mag limped off the Madison Square Garden court with a serious knee injury - 6:25 remaining in the first half. At the time, the teams were trading baskets. In the second half, Paul took control of the game and scored 17 points to lead Rutgers to the victory.
My point is, yes, Mag is an important player. Still, Rutgers season does not hang on the play of one guy or the call of an official. Blaming the failure to make the NCAA tournament on Mag's injury or, more pathetically, an official missing an out of bounds call at Ohio State, is whiny nonsense.
My point is, yes, Mag is an important player. Still, Rutgers season does not hang on the play of one guy or the call of an official. Blaming the failure to make the NCAA tournament on Mag's injury or, more pathetically, an official missing an out of bounds call at Ohio State, is whiny nonsense.
When it appears that you were the first team left out… not whiny nonsense.
The way Ohio State was stolen from us. It wasn’t a judgmental call that could go against us but refs not following the rules… it’s not whiny nonsense.
When it’s not the first time we’ve had ridiculously poor officiating go against us. Remember St. John’s in the B1G East? It’s not whiny nonsense.
Have you watched RU games since we entered the B1G ever get benefits of calls home and away? It’s not whiny interest.
We have Mags rest of year don’t think it’s unreasonable to think we could have one at least one more game. It’s not Whitney nonsense.
OSU was a travesty and as seen earlier I’m not one to complain about refs. Minnesota was the dagger.
Yes, because there were later opportunities to make up for those events. We lost at home to SHU and Iowa, and then the @Minny disaster. The team blew it unrelated to Mag and the OSU non-call.
Some folks here may be too young to know who Gumby is. (Not the version played by Eddie Murphy.)
What exactly is your point? We had 3 great defenders on last year’s team that made it special. Nobody said it was only Mag - it was that losing any one of them (Mag included) was a problem. There is no way we lose the Temple game if Caleb was available for example. No doubt if we didn’t have Cliff for game that would’ve be a disaster too. We didn’t have the depth to replace any of them. That Caleb and Cliff were also very important doesn’t diminish Mag’s value in any way. As I said - I don’t understand the point you are arguing here. This year’s D is even better than last year’s - Mag is a big part of this. Nobody saying Cliff isn’t important once again too.
Sometimes, a poster just wants to be right no matter how ridiculous the point is.
Ace Bailey doesn’t fit the typical profile of a big 10 player (whatever that means). So he wouldn’t be a big 10 player?
Well, you see, what fans don't understand is that being a Big Ten player isn't just about having flashy stats or fitting into a specific mold. It's about embodying the grit, toughness, and physicality that define the conference's style of play. When we talk about a player like Ace Bailey, who might not fit the typical profile of a Big Ten player, it's important to look beyond superficial stereotypes. Bailey may not have the brute strength or imposing size that some expect from a Big Ten player, but that doesn't mean he can't hold his own on the court. His unique skills and contributions might not always show up in the box score, but they can be just as valuable to his team's success. So, while Bailey might not fit the mold in the traditional sense, his ability to compete and make an impact speaks volumes about what it truly means to be a Big Ten player.
Agree. I remember the Minnesota game. During the game, with Rutgers comfortably in the lead, the team was celebrating by dancing to a pop song being played on the arena intercom system. Poor form on and off the court by the players and coaches caused that loss.
