RU fans (Chow) are fine when they want their declaration made regarding a player to try and look like the SportsRadio host or ESPN.
I will ask this quesrion....the starting backcourt contributed 2 total points and the supposedly ineffective Baker didn't score BUT the entire team almost overcame Baker and Mathis contributing just 2 points.
The opponents goal is to stop Baker first....because he's RUs most effective player, catalyst and organizer. Last month, it was Caleb McConnell who was supposed to start over Geo after his big game and now Mulcahy is the next player on your list.
What's dangerous about these comments are not only are they inaccurate, but they place an unnecessary bullseye on a player who doesn't have the scoring ability or shooting ability displayed at the HS level, but he's going to shoot and score in highly leveraged situations in college??
Mulcahy isn't a strong defender on the ball and until he shows a hopeful ability to score, teams are going to make it much more difficult for others to score. Which is actually much worse for the RU team to have a guard (in your.words) that should be the starting PG.
Players are not going to arrive as the "best passer seen in years", if you have no one open to pass the ball to, because teams sag off on you, because you're not showing an ability to shoot or score. At Gill, his passing is highlighted because he has the ball and teams have to play him to score.
At this level of speed and coaching, opponents break down your tape and you are evaluating Baker as the focal point of the offense. And because of that, others are able to score and have space. The actual results are team oriented and the only way I can see Mulcahy thriving is by playing WITH Geo Baker, not in place of him. At least in that situation, Mulcahy will be the least guarded of the 5 starters or most likely to left open to score.
If that happens and Mulcahy takes advantage of being with Baker, Harper, Eugene, Mathis, Caleb on the court, he will help. But the notion that Mulcahy is going to be able to make passes to wide open players who won't be open, is at best questionable.
I am happy Mulcahy is coming, but he has 1 job arriving at RU....work on his jumper, 3 point shot and willingness to score. If he does that, RU becomes a better team. But he is nowhere near the complete player Baker is, until he scores and can prove he can shoot....otherwise his strength of passing becomes muted and he will make RU easier to stop, not harder.