I believe Tagliabue was providing free advice to the Big East as part of his role at Georgetown. I guess the Big East got what they paid for. But he wasn't protecting the interests of the BE,
he was protecting the interests of Georgetown. It is interesting to note that when ESPN came in with their low-ball offer, only Rutgers, Notre Dame, and Georgetown initially balked at it. Those were the 3 Big East schools with leaders (Pernetti, Swarbrick, Tagliabue) who had independent expertise in sports media.
In fairness to Tranghese, he was a basketball guy who never really understood the dynamics of football. He knew that the Big East needed to add football in order to satisfy the schools that sponsored football (Pitt, Cuse, BC), but he never figured out how to balance a league that was half BB-only schools and half FB/BB schools. And he didn't have the vision to realize that unless he negotiated a workable split, the conference would always be unstable.
In edit: yep. Tagliabue was an unpaid consultant to the BE. He did a great job disparaging the value of Rutgers (
http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/22/tagliabue-has-stern-words-for-big-ten/?_r=0), but now we know that Rutgers and Maryland added $50MM in TV rights to the Big Ten, plus more in BTN dividends. This October's RU-Minn game should be called "The Battle for Paul Tagliabue's Tennis Racquet".