99% sure he will be back. Leaves one open scholarship.
Check who posted the thread.I think he comes back but harf to say 99% when you don’t know him. He’s not getting drafted but maybe he wants to go overseas and play professionally.
Not 99% at all. It would leave 2 not 1. We’re not obligated to give the last one to a walk on again.99% sure he will be back. Leaves one open scholarship.
Not obligated to but we're going to. In the age of the portal almost no team is going to have 13 happy "true" scholarship players.Not 99% at all. It would leave 2 not 1. We’re not obligated to give the last one to a walk on again.
He did say it would be a major upset if we didn't get Hammond but I get that things evolved quickly with Spencer jumping ahead.I have no idea who RU72 is but clearly he’s well connected to internal team information.
When he posts, it’s essential fact. Unless someone here has proof otherwise.
I don’t know who that is. He’s with Rutgers?Check who posted the thread.
You can go through his post history with scheduling and player updates and see the hit rate. He's not going to give away who he is or how he gets his info for obvious reasons but the results speak for themselves.I don’t know who that is. He’s with Rutgers?
I was thinking we’d be targeting someone like Agee for that last spot rather than give it to Terry but maybe not.Not obligated to but we're going to. In the age of the portal almost no team is going to have 13 happy "true" scholarship players.
He did say it would be a major upset if we didn't get Hammond but I get that things evolved quickly with Spencer jumping ahead.
Would be a huge upset if he does not come to Rutgers. Would seem clear that Rutgers will get at a minimum one of Hammond,Spencer and Dawes. My own theory is that the Big Ten affiliation is more helpful with portal than high school kids,who recently have chosen Nova,UConn , Georgetown,DePaul and of course the trump card of Duke over everyone.
Not sure who is plan A bit Rutgers is DEFINITELY getting one of the 3 very soon.
I have no idea who RU72 is but clearly he’s well connected to internal team information.
When he posts, it’s essentially fact. Unless someone here has proof otherwise.
RU72 is Richard Kent. A good portion of the board knows who he is.I don’t know who that is. He’s with Rutgers?
I am re-reading the "What if?" story which was a good one. We all know what the biggest "What if?" was back in the day. You could also call it "WTF?!"RU72 is Richard Kent. A good portion of the board knows who he is.
These links will give you some of his background...
https://www.onthebanks.com/2015/12/...-kent-bob-knight-wenzel-jordan-gavitt-paterno
https://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/07/nyregion/what-a-dedicated-fan-can-do.html
https://www.hamdenhall.org/news-detail?pk=670959
But it was posted on April 1st~
The reverse psychology of it is epic. Posting on April 1st so people think it's a joke. That's a DPOY move with those mind gamesBut it was posted on April 1st~
MO
RU72 is my new favorite poster. His info is 100% legit. Thanks @RU72Check who posted the thread.
It does not sound like that is the plan from mods and other sources. That might be it or a depth 5 with a walk on getting one and another open scholarshipIf he is back we need 1 more player that can give 20+ minutes, not be a liability on D and can score.
The open ended questions........It does not sound like that is the plan from mods and other sources. That might be it or a depth 5 with a walk on getting one and another open scholarship
I agree. Pike is definitely taking a risk. He is betting on his guys to step up. If they don't live up to expectations and/or we get hit with injuries, his scholarship usage will come into question.The open ended questions........
1. Can Hyatt be an asset in 2022-23......he wasnt; in 2021-22, no sugar coating!
2. Will Mag make the giant leap you and I are expecting?
3. How ready is Simpson?
If the answers are not all favorable we need Caleb + another body
The problem is/was preseason he didn't know Hyatt, which is totally understandable. When I told him in June that I was worried about defense he specifically said well you will love Hyatt then.I agree. Pike is definitely taking a risk. He is betting on his guys to step up. If they don't live up to expectations and/or we get hit with injuries, his scholarship usage will come into question.
He knows the guys on his team though. I have faith in Pike until he proves otherwise
Hyatt's defense got better and he was much better when he got switched to the 4. Hyatt can't guard the 3 he is a 4. I am really not concerned with his D at the 4 after a year with Pike.The problem is/was preseason he didn't know Hyatt, which is totally understandable. When I told him in June that I was worried about defense he specifically said well you will love Hyatt then.
I’m not concerned with his D at the 4 on it’s own. I’m concerned that with Paul and Cam in the backcourt together most of the game, having Caleb on bail out at the 3 won’t be enough. I don’t see Hyatt helping in this respect at the 4. At best he’s not a liability in terms of guarding his own guy. If we need someone else to provide defensive spark with Caleb, my hope lies more with Mag. I could see potential for that being a really good line up - Paul, Cam, Caleb, Mag and Cliff - if Mag takes steps forward on offense.Hyatt's defense got better and he was much better when he got switched to the 4. Hyatt can't guard the 3 he is a 4. I am really not concerned with his D at the 4 after a year with Pike.
Some concerns still with the roster. Hyatt's D at the 4 isn't one of them for me. It will be average at minimum
More concerned with Hyatt’s offensive output / efficiency than anything. Defense not so much, especially with some of the league’s better 4’s (Liddell and Murray) leaving the conferenceHyatt's defense got better and he was much better when he got switched to the 4. Hyatt can't guard the 3 he is a 4. I am really not concerned with his D at the 4 after a year with Pike.
Some concerns still with the roster. Hyatt's D at the 4 isn't one of them for me. It will be average at minimum
By the end of the season, Hyatt was mostly playing with both Geo and Caleb in the game or Miller on the floor with one of those 2. Defensively, we couldn’t play him and Paul together on defense in the perimeter game. If Sepencer turns out to be sub par on defense, I don’t see Hyatt playing much with both him and Paul together unless he really improves in this area.More concerned with Hyatt’s offensive output / efficiency than anything. Defense not so much, especially with some of the league’s better 4’s (Liddell and Murray) leaving the conference
I was kidding!But it was posted on April 1st~
MO
I’m not saying I love Hyatt’s defense, it’s more so out of need that I think we’ll need one of him / Mag on the floor fairly often (just from a size standpoint). Team is certainly shaping up to be predicated around guard-play and Cliff, but when it comes to guarding bigger wings/forwards, we don’t exactly have a ton of optionsBy the end of the season, Hyatt was mostly playing with both Geo and Caleb in the game or Miller on the floor with one of those 2. Defensively, we couldn’t play him and Paul together on defense in the perimeter game. If Sepencer turns out to be sub par on defense, I don’t see Hyatt playing much with both him and Paul together unless he really improves in this area.
By the end of the season Hyatt's minutes were simply the minutes Harper was on the bench.By the end of the season, Hyatt was mostly playing with both Geo and Caleb in the game or Miller on the floor with one of those 2. Defensively, we couldn’t play him and Paul together on defense in the perimeter game. If Sepencer turns out to be sub par on defense, I don’t see Hyatt playing much with both him and Paul together unless he really improves in this area.
The best on ball defenders are Caleb Miller and Mag. I can see Hyatt potentially being a plus defender at the 4 especially if you include rebounding.I’m not concerned with his D at the 4 on it’s own. I’m concerned that with Paul and Cam in the backcourt together most of the game, having Caleb on bail out at the 3 won’t be enough. I don’t see Hyatt helping in this respect at the 4. At best he’s not a liability in terms of guarding his own guy. If we need someone else to provide defensive spark with Caleb, my hope lies more with Mag. I could see potential for that being a really good line up - Paul, Cam, Caleb, Mag and Cliff - if Mag takes steps forward on offense.