I like Cronin but I can't see his style being loved in Westwood.
$4M/year WOW!!
4 mil in LA goes about as far as 2 mil in Cincinnati with taxes and cost of living.
Right but Cincinnati is still Cincinnati. I think I would take 4 mil to live in SoCal year round rather than 2 to live in SoOh.4 mil in LA goes about as far as 2 mil in Cincinnati with taxes and cost of living.
Right but Cincinnati is still Cincinnati. I think I would take 4 mil to live in SoCal year round rather than 2 to live in SoOh.
I would say Cronin might have seen it becoming harder to recruit the type of talent he was able to in the past and decided to go to a place that has far more upside. His Cincinnati teams still were winning, but being in the AAC was a drawback when going after top talent. He probably felt he accomplished all he could there and the chances of his Bearcats staying a top program were becoming slimmer because of the conference affiliation they haveCorrect and the other poster is correct on their campus and their facility.
I doubt Mick Cronin needs money at this point in his life but it was more like he's been at Cincy 13 years and needed a change.
Not shocked if they go after the HC at Murray State.
Last time they did that they got Cronin.
I agree. I can trouble ahead in the fuselage Fredrick.I like Cronin but I can't see his style being loved in Westwood.
I would say Cronin might have seen it becoming harder to recruit the type of talent he was able to in the past and decided to go to a place that has far more upside. His Cincinnati teams still were winning, but being in the AAC was a drawback when going after top talent. He probably felt he accomplished all he could there and the chances of his Bearcats staying a top program were becoming slimmer because of the conference affiliation they have
UCLA is in a major conference that isn't very strong now. Making his jumping to UCLA , now, a good move professionally.
Cronin will win there.
The question is going to be how much winning is enough ?
I would say Cronin might have seen it becoming harder to recruit the type of talent he was able to in the past and decided to go to a place that has far more upside. His Cincinnati teams still were winning, but being in the AAC was a drawback when going after top talent. He probably felt he accomplished all he could there and the chances of his Bearcats staying a top program were becoming slimmer because of the conference affiliation they have
UCLA is in a major conference that isn't very strong now. Making his jumping to UCLA , now, a good move professionally.
Yup and that's always the question there. Look at the guys they have shown the door in recent years. They all won to some degree, but not enough.Cronin will win there.
The question is going to be how much winning is enough ?
Yeah, but what's reasonable? If a coach there isn't in the Final Four in at least three years, the seat gets hot.If it isn’t competing for national championships st some point, not enough.
Alford took UCLA on a roller coaster ride of 22, 15, 31, 21 seasons and a 7-6 start this season that included a home losses to Belmont and Liberty + a road loss to Mick Cronin, Alford's time had run out at UCLA.Yup and that's always the question there. Look at the guys they have shown the door in recent years. They all won to some degree, but not enough.
Looking back, losses to Belmont and Liberty don;t look that bad considering they both made the NCAA's and played well.Alford took UCLA on a roller coaster ride of 22, 15, 31, 21 seasons and a 7-6 start this season that included a home losses to Belmont and Liberty + a road loss to Mick Cronin, Alford's time had run out at UCLA.
Yes he had three S16 seasons, he had three top-5 recruiting classes in a row (2016-2018), he had 7 players picked in the first round of their draft years, but he also never won the Pac-12, couldn't get past the S16, that international incident happened during his tenure which took some shine off of the UCLA brand, oh and a booster flew a plane over campus that had a "Fire Alford" attached to it. Lots of talk that Alford never embraced the UCLA community, I don't know if that's true or not, but I'm thinking that if it is not true then that plane probably would not have been pulling that banner.
Big Boy Basketball. Heck they fired Howland and Alford never came close to what Howland accomplished at UCLA.
Doesn't matter.Looking back, losses to Belmont and Liberty don;t look that bad considering they both made the NCAA's and played well.
That’s what I was referring to. Going back to Harrick, Lavin, and Howland. They are a little spoiled and delusional “big boy (corrupt)” hoops aside.Alford took UCLA on a roller coaster ride of 22, 15, 31, 21 seasons and a 7-6 start this season that included a home losses to Belmont and Liberty + a road loss to Mick Cronin, Alford's time had run out at UCLA.
Yes he had three S16 seasons, he had three top-5 recruiting classes in a row (2016-2018), he had 7 players picked in the first round of their draft years, but he also never won the Pac-12, couldn't get past the S16, that international incident happened during his tenure which took some shine off of the UCLA brand, oh and a booster flew a plane over campus that had a "Fire Alford" attached to it. Lots of talk that Alford never embraced the UCLA community, I don't know if that's true or not, but I'm thinking that if it is not true then that plane probably would not have been pulling that banner.
Big Boy Basketball. Heck they fired Howland and Alford never came close to what Howland accomplished at UCLA.
I work with a big Cincinnati fan who is thrilled Cronin is gone. He was upset the Bearcats were not advancing deeply in the NCAA tournaments. We will see if he regrets that a few years from now.
Cincinnati was going to fall off anyway as Memphis and UConn rise back up the AAC. He picked a good time to get out.
Spoiled? Definitely. Delusional? Nah.That’s what I was referring to. Going back to Harrick, Lavin, and Howland. They are a little spoiled and delusional “big boy (corrupt)” hoops aside.
I disagree. I think Cronin taking the UCLA job was a major step up for his career. Even with UCLA down as it has been, it's a higher profile job than Cincy. So, I really don't think he was concerned about not going deep into the NCAA's or his record against Xavier or being able to take the program to the next level.That doesn't seem likely. 9 straight NCAA appearances and 23 out of the last 28. Returning a likely top 25 team next season in a new (renovated) arena. I think he was more concerned that he wouldn't be able to ever take the program to the next level as opposed to falling off.
No matter how far it has fallen in recent years, UCLA should be considered a plum job for just about every College HC and returning it to elite status probably would make the HC a legend in his lifetime.I disagree. I think Cronin taking the UCLA job was a major step up for his career. Even with UCLA down as it has been, it's a higher profile job than Cincy. So, I really don't think he was concerned about not going deep into the NCAA's or his record against Xavier or being able to take the program to the next level.
I disagree. I think Cronin taking the UCLA job was a major step up for his career. Even with UCLA down as it has been, it's a higher profile job than Cincy. So, I really don't think he was concerned about not going deep into the NCAA's or his record against Xavier or being able to take the program to the next level.