not one close game or upset alert!!!!!! Big ten and ru should ban them from all games.
One of their analysts predicted SHU by 25.Maybe they figured RU was going to win easily and thus, no upset. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
I don't think it's a company-wide policy to dislike Rutgers, but I do believe there are individuals who do dislike Rutgers. Some of them happened to be in prominent positions and have that platform to express their feelings. That may explain why we see certain stories given from a less positive POV.Funny, when other teams snap similar streaks, you see that on the scroll. But we hate ESPN, so we must spin it as negative.
Would you believe I saw a scroll the other day about a team winning its first game against a top-TWO team in X number of years? You know how hard it is to beat a top-two team? Who DOESN'T have a losing streak against top-two teams? But there it was, noting it's somebody's first win against a top-two team since whenever.
But since it's about Rutgers, it's obviously meant to be a slight and all part of their massive plot to undermine us.
Grow up, folks.
Btw, I think the new TV deal for the B1G has rubbed certain individuals at ESPN the wrong way. Some ESPN personalities saw this potential when they missed out including Rutgers into the ACC. If you don't believe that, then you're in denial.
NoDoes the Disney - 21st Century Fox deal include Fox's share of BTN? If it does, does that change ESPN's view of the Big Ten?
Wow talk about doom and gloomA bit off topic....
Almost everyone household in the US currently pays to watch sports. This is going to change and it will have a dramatic impact on both college and professional sports. The young people of today will not have cable or satellite. I think we will see a drastic decline in the prices media pays to televise sports when contracts are up. Professional salaries are going down over time.
As for Rutgers...fast forward 15-20 years...the state of NJ is a fiscal mess....no money from the state will indirectly fund athletics....B1G revenue down 50%+ over 15 years. College coaches will not all be making $1,000,000+.
A bit back on topic....
I have no idea of ESPN's role in the new world.
fox sports not going to espn"no" to which question?
This is silly. Typical “project trend into a future where nothing else changes” nonsense. You think media and entertainment business are going to roll over and shrug that no one watches them anymore? Think new platforms, new content channels, new forms of content consumption, etc. TV viewership can plummet and revenue can still grow. Not at all mutually exclusive.A bit off topic....
Almost everyone household in the US currently pays to watch sports. This is going to change and it will have a dramatic impact on both college and professional sports. The young people of today will not have cable or satellite. I think we will see a drastic decline in the prices media pays to televise sports when contracts are up. Professional salaries are going down over time.
As for Rutgers...fast forward 15-20 years...the state of NJ is a fiscal mess....no money from the state will indirectly fund athletics....B1G revenue down 50%+ over 15 years. College coaches will not all be making $1,000,000+.
A bit back on topic....
I have no idea of ESPN's role in the new world.
And just because you get to watch for free doesn't mean there's no money in it. Think of the old days of free tv programming. Advertising pays the bills.
And just because you get to watch for free doesn't mean there's no money in it. Think of the old days of free tv programming. Advertising pays the bills.
This is silly. Typical “project trend into a future where nothing else changes” nonsense. You think media and entertainment business are going to roll over and shrug that no one watches them anymore? Think new platforms, new content channels, new forms of content consumption, etc. TV viewership can plummet and revenue can still grow. Not at all mutually exclusive.
I believe the regional Fox networks are included, which will give ESPN local rights for about 44 professional franchises. I think YES is part of the deal. Main Fox network, Fox News channels, Fox Sports (FS1/FS2/BTN) are not included.Wow talk about doom and gloom
fox sports not going to espn
Yes, but the amount of $ that the average person for media WILL go down.
I am paying $225 month for cable and internet and I watch sports, 2 news channels (none with the letter X) and the weather channel 5 days a year. We also have netflix for $13.99? More than 50% of the time we are consuming media via Apple TV.
How the hell do you pay $225 a month for that? I pay about half that for cable and internet. I have a low-level TV package (with no premium channels) which gives me my basic sports channels (including BTN).
I always assumed that the people with huge TV bills were paying for platinum packages plus premium movie channels.
Good point re: multiple boxes. A lot of what you pay for goes to the intermediary (cable company) rather than the content creator. If viewing is increasingly done on personal devices (iPad, phablets, phones, etc) over in-house wifi, out of pocket could come down significantly while content providers actually make same or more. Might then bring non-consumers into the market b/c total spend now works for more moderate budgets.How the hell do you pay $225 a month for that? I pay about half that for cable and internet. I have a low-level TV package (with no premium channels) which gives me my basic sports channels (including BTN).
I always assumed that the people with huge TV bills were paying for platinum packages plus premium movie channels.
They get me with BTN and i think I omitted the fact there is one SHO show my wife watches. The biggest rip off is paying for $10 each for 4 cable boxes. 2 of those TVs are rarely watched.
That's really the only place I complain. I have no issues with the bundling etc..I end up spending 40 some odd bucks for 1 multiroom DVR and 2 other boxes. I don't mind paying for the DVR service but I'd prefer something of a 1 time fee for the box and that's it.They get me with BTN and i think I omitted the fact there is one SHO show my wife watches. The biggest rip off is paying for $10 each for 4 cable boxes. 2 of those TVs are rarely watched.
Good point re: multiple boxes. A lot of what you pay for goes to the intermediary (cable company) rather than the content creator. If viewing is increasingly done on personal devices (iPad, phablets, phones, etc) over in-house wifi, out of pocket could come down significantly while content providers actually make same or more. Might then bring non-consumers into the market b/c total spend now works for more moderate budgets.
Obviously a very complex business and set of business models - just making the point that I don’t believe for a second the money is coming out of live programming (sport, entertainment, etc). So . . . no sky-is-falling, the best (economic) days of being B1G are behind us. Not buying that at all.
That's really the only place I complain. I have no issues with the bundling etc..I end up spending 40 some odd bucks for 1 multiroom DVR and 2 other boxes. I don't mind paying for the DVR service but I'd prefer something of a 1 time fee for the box and that's it.
That's really the only place I complain. I have no issues with the bundling etc..I end up spending 40 some odd bucks for 1 multiroom DVR and 2 other boxes. I don't mind paying for the DVR service but I'd prefer something of a 1 time fee for the box and that's it.
Eventually, I think the boxes will be gone because everyone is heading towards streaming and OTT services. I don't know when that will happen though.
As to Disney-Fox deal, it does NOT include any of their news and sports. They're building the new Fox around those things like Fox News, Fox Sports and BTN, etc.. will stay under Fox. There's even talk they could merge back with News Corp some time in the future.
International assets, movie studios and some cable channels like NatGeo, A&E, I think and maybe some Fox Regional sports channels will go to Disney.
Agree. It's similar to the Walmart Amazon discussions I've had here in the past where people think Amazon is taking over everything (they are to a degree) and Walmart is going to roll over and die tomorrow. I said no as long as they adapt to the new trends in online retail etc.. they will be just fine and the two will continue to coexist. Walmart has been doing well as of late.This is silly. Typical “project trend into a future where nothing else changes” nonsense. You think media and entertainment business are going to roll over and shrug that no one watches them anymore? Think new platforms, new content channels, new forms of content consumption, etc. TV viewership can plummet and revenue can still grow. Not at all mutually exclusive.
Consolidation is the trend in the industry. CBS is out there as a partner for someone possibly. I was even wondering if Verizon who tried to bid for Fox but lost to Disney might try again with the smaller Fox. They need more content. Comcast would likely have antitrust issues especially because of their NBC acquisition.Where do you think the Discovery channel fits in with all of this. I am thinking not good.
They don't need to have cable or satellite. Like I said I think everything will eventually be streaming either through wired broadband or wireless when speed and reliability match wired.I think what you are missing is that young people won't have cable or satellite. People under the age of 25 don't even have TVs. They may pay for sports media indirectly to bars and Buffalo Wild Wings.
Yes a lot of change will happen. There won't be winners and losers. There will be survivors and losers. Not a zero sum game here.
ESPN has its own issues, just announced ESPNs president John Skipper is resigning due to substance abuse
Just saw this tweet.
Brett McMurphyVerified account@Brett_McMurphy 7m7 minutes ago
ACC, SEC & Pac-12 conferences will launch their own channels on @SIRIUSXM starting next year
Driverless. I'll be happy if that technology is perfected by the time I'm a senior, 40 now.In our lifetime (hopefully mine) we probably end up watching sports while in our car.