ADVERTISEMENT

Football Parking

Looked at recent charge and it shows Blue at 40 per game based on new charge plus old...was it that high last year?

I may have slept through part of renewal but 40 per is getting a little high imo...

Where does it list per game cost per lot? Couldn't find it....
 
The initial charge is $20 per game and then adjusted when you get the lot officially.
 
And people on this board used to say only Millenials wanted everything handed to them!!
Don't know about the Millenials thing, but how do you figure it's a hand out ?
I'm only talking about what I feel I'm entitled to when it comes to credit for my years as a season ticket holder. Maybe the bonus point scale should be higher the longer you've been a loyal fan and not a 2 point difference. The donation part is always going to be what it is and will probably only go up, fine.
Look across the scarlet lot from the green and figure out the age of the majority of people excluding the older alumms up front. Can't be 50 and lots of young kids too. They can't be there by themselves without buying their way in or getting tickets from family, not enough years. If they have $$$$ to spend then the University is in better shape than we think.
A lot of the older fans have other issues that affect them:
1) might not want or are not able to afford to buy extra points.
2) have a mobility issue and need a closer lot because of the transport setup.
Parking at the RAC doesn't remedy the situation, not the price, but distance from drop off point and maybe standing too long.
3. What are the these people going to see from RU in the future that they can benefit from now ?

You probably have many years ahead of you and hopefully so, but the older fans don't have that luxury so why not treat them with a little respect.
My family and myself are not RU grads and have no affiliation to the school which says a lot more about the support of their programs.
So be it.
 
I'm only talking about what I feel I'm entitled to when it comes to credit for my years as a season ticket holder.

That's the thing, you're not actually entitled to anything. You bought tickets 15 years ago to see a game 15 years ago. You got what you paid for. You're not actually entitled to anything else.

That said, as I indicated earlier in this thread, I think it makes sense for Rutgers to adjust the minimum donation required for lots to provide more equity to people who have donated a lot of money over time. I'm not suggesting this because the donors are entitled to something, but because I think it makes sense for Rutgers.

Likewise, I think it makes sense for Rutgers to improve transportation to the further lots for those with mobility issues.
 
That's the thing, you're not actually entitled to anything. You bought tickets 15 years ago to see a game 15 years ago. You got what you paid for. You're not actually entitled to anything else.

That said, as I indicated earlier in this thread, I think it makes sense for Rutgers to adjust the minimum donation required for lots to provide more equity to people who have donated a lot of money over time. I'm not suggesting this because the donors are entitled to something, but because I think it makes sense for Rutgers.

Likewise, I think it makes sense for Rutgers to improve transportation to the further lots for those with mobility issues.
Unless the policy has changed since last year everyone receives credit for consecutive years as a season ticket holder. (Only talking FB) Using your example of 15 years, yes I got credit for them. (15 priority points) My question is where are the other 50 points for the other years. There was no cutoff date mentioned in the original plan or since. Only hear say from the office people and an arbitrary point total for older fans. About 5 years ago, I was told they started with 17 years and the max given was 31. Why, because of the computer glitch. Same thing happened to a close friend who had been going just as long as me.
Anyway, why shouldn't I get credit for those missing years. As you said, I bought the tickets and saw the games, but didn't get the priority points. I am entitled unless they can explain why I'm not with a rational explanation.
The other even bigger problem is that under the 3rd party ticket handling procedure, nobody really cares including management. The present people have no idea where to start even if they think they can help.
Like I said, it is what it has become, but doesn't make it right. The only thing that matters is what they think.
I'm happy in white lot if they fix the nightingale service and that seems like a no-brainer so I hope Hobbs figures something out. Not that difficult !
 
That's the thing, you're not actually entitled to anything. You bought tickets 15 years ago to see a game 15 years ago. You got what you paid for. You're not actually entitled to anything else.

That said, as I indicated earlier in this thread, I think it makes sense for Rutgers to adjust the minimum donation required for lots to provide more equity to people who have donated a lot of money over time. I'm not suggesting this because the donors are entitled to something, but because I think it makes sense for Rutgers.

Likewise, I think it makes sense for Rutgers to improve transportation to the further lots for those with mobility issues.

Unless the policy has changed since last year everyone receives credit for consecutive years as a season ticket holder. (Only talking FB) Using your example of 15 years, yes I got credit for them. (15 priority points) My question is where are the other 50 points for the other years. There was no cutoff date mentioned in the original plan or since. Only hear say from the office people and an arbitrary point total for older fans. About 5 years ago, I was told they started with 17 years and the max given was 31. Why, because of the computer glitch. Same thing happened to a close friend who had been going just as long as me.
Anyway, why shouldn't I get credit for those missing years. As you said, I bought the tickets and saw the games, but didn't get the priority points. I am entitled unless they can explain why I'm not with a rational explanation.
The other even bigger problem is that under the 3rd party ticket handling procedure, nobody really cares including management. The present people have no idea where to start even if they think they can help.
Like I said, it is what it has become, but doesn't make it right. The only thing that matters is what they think.
I'm happy in white lot if they fix the Knightingale service and that seems like a no-brainer so I hope Hobbs figures something out. Not that difficult !
As usual I will side with @Upstream on this.

But agree with both of you on the bolded.

The Knightingale Shuttle needs more stops. This should have been discussed/part of the B1G FB Gameday Strategic Plan from the get go.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT