How many verbals does RU have for next year ?
- Thread starter Kbee3
- Start date
Yeah, for some reason Rivals hasn't ever listed Thiam in its list - though he does appear on other sites.
Rivals is pretty good on the football side for most things... but the basketball side is frequently out of date.
It's Thiam who everyone will like the most in this class IMO. Thiam is a WF, Dailey can play SG and WF and Tripp is a SG. They don't play the same position
I've seen several articles/write ups that call Tripp a forward or a wing, and a few that call him a SG. I'd imagine he can play the 2 or 3, if necessary. Same as Dailey. Thiam seems more like a true WF... though he's now supposed to be 6'9" or taller at this point?
Are any of these 3 recruits consistent 3 point shooters?If there is a coaching change, is the new head coach bound to honor scholarships offered by Jordan?The answers to these questions will impact the roster and how the team performs next season.
What do you mean IF there is a coaching change ?
7 wins in your third year gets no coach another year.
Man -- not fair to lump Goode and Laurent together. Goode is a role player (maybe) on a low minor as a junior or senior. Laurent is a contributor on a mid-major as a frosh. Goode would not be on any other B1G roster. Period. Laurent would play for 4 or 5 other programs. Like it or not, the next coach will build the program on a 9-man rotation with a half dozen kids like Laurent plus 2 or 3 B1G-ready starters (Sanders, Freeman and _______).
Next year? Tripp and Dailey were wild heaves from half court by Shoes. Thiam? I'm always suspicious of kids who pass though Canarias being able to get through the Clearinghouse. But maybe getting Thiam into the school in Belmar helps on the qualifying and he sounds like he could be a piece for the new staff to work with.
Next year? Tripp and Dailey were wild heaves from half court by Shoes. Thiam? I'm always suspicious of kids who pass though Canarias being able to get through the Clearinghouse. But maybe getting Thiam into the school in Belmar helps on the qualifying and he sounds like he could be a piece for the new staff to work with.
Fair points, 78, and I agree with your analysis.
Our Canary kids have not shown me much so far and I have no expectations for the latest edition, even if he does qualify. There are no secrets in recruiting world. There is a reason the kid was lightly recruited, just as there are reasons Sanders was not lightly recruited
Our Canary kids have not shown me much so far and I have no expectations for the latest edition, even if he does qualify. There are no secrets in recruiting world. There is a reason the kid was lightly recruited, just as there are reasons Sanders was not lightly recruited
I hear there is still a *** player in Arkansas who is 6'1'' and can jump out of the gym, but needs to work on his handle and shooting. Still working on getting his grades us and could reclassify for 2017.
Soon to be zero yes, but I am fully confident whoever the new coach will be, will be able to land four players with more B1G potential in the Spring
LOL, four players with more potential. You realize that at best, the new coach will have 3 weeks before the signing period.
Yes but transfer season soon begins....as well as decommits due to coaching changes, it's like free agency now in college
LOL. You'd think we have Michigan's Fab Five coming in. I'm crossing my fingers several DO decommit so the new coach doesn't have to be tied to the scraps Eddie picked up.
Good coaches always land a decent guy late...didnt Bannon get Greer late in the game, Waters with Coleman, Rice got Poole...heck even Jordan got a 5th year guy in Moore
I think your support of the former coach was the definition of clueless.
If ever there was a recruiting class where we were to lose our verbals, this would be the one.
That's right, I support any current coach and any current team members....as opposed to yoru bashing
Are these all just verbals or have all signed LOI? If they are all verbals or a few are only verbals the new coach will have the option of accepting their LOI or bringing in players that he likes better.
its about judging and having expectations...blind support does not seem productive when you are going 6-40 over your last 46 games
Why? Because of their extensive offer lists and lofty recruiting rankings?
Last edited:
Manhattan, Laurent had a 19 point and 15 rebound game vs Penn State. Kid could be good, even the Big ten announcers said he was playing well. And last time a frosh had a game like that? We got Coleman I believe because he played hs ball with Sherrod.
Issa Thiam Is a 3 star recruit looks decent in this video.
http://www.maxpreps.com/news/wmJrb0...0-miles-to-play-in-a-tournament-this-week.htm
Well wait a minute now the kid from Ohio (Daily?) was "promised" a scholarship IF he chose to go PG for a year.
BTW - why is Thiam STILL not listed here?
Similar threads
