the problem is that there will be no perfect candidate here. RU's profile was higher in football despite the Elmer mess and in football you only have 128 jobs. Hoops has 351...In football you can hire top notch assistants to move to a football job, in hoops you dont see that, rarely if ever. Most coaches move their way up the ranks, Hurley seems to be one of those. Do we know if his team was going to make the NCAA this year....well the top player was out and might be worth 4-5 wins so they would be on the bubble somewhere much like Lonergan's GW team who failed to make it this year after high expectations. There are not many guys we can pick. Is Stony Brook's coach so much better than Hurley because he made the NCAA this year and Hurley hasnt...its a much lesser program. The plusses for Hurley is that he is from NJ, he knows the recruiting area and his father is a NJ coaching legend, you would have to think these are things that could help...and could help with fundraising as well.
Hurley haters seemed peed off because the Hurleys didnt send their players to RU all that much although Ech, Biruta, Rosario were examples. At the end of the day why should they have taken a chance on RU when RU had an AD like Uncle Bob who clearly drew a line in the sand and said we are going to put all of our money in football and we will not be supporting basketball. Dont be mad a AAU coaches and high school coaches from NJ..they didnt create the abyss that RU admininstration did for years by neglecting the program. When they see a school not interested in supporting hoops they will shun it and even laugh it. So peoples anger toward the Hurleys is better suite towards Uncle Bob who did what he had to do to get RU in the Big 10 but hoops guys dont care about that.