MSU is literally out of D ends. Their line is will be essentially be all D Tackles (or very newly converted LBs).
Given they will be big, stout and slow on the line, running off tackle will be a foolish endevor.
See AC getting 5+ carries, a decent amount of Saalam, but see Rochelle big in the mix.
When running we have to attack the edge and perimeter. If LBs need to come up big to support, then Wimsatt can throw the slants over the LBs.
Please do not for the love of God try and run off tackle!
In the end see Rochelle getting 7+ carries, AC 5+ carries, Saalam 5+ carries.
I think it was right getting rid of Gleeson, but honestly think this is a game where a "thinking" OC is at an advantage. This is not the game to "keep it simple". We need to find ways to exploit there unique situation (no DE and al DT).
Attach the perimeter on the run game, and do not be afraid to call longer developing pass plays, as MSU is really no threat to get a pass rush.
Given they will be big, stout and slow on the line, running off tackle will be a foolish endevor.
See AC getting 5+ carries, a decent amount of Saalam, but see Rochelle big in the mix.
When running we have to attack the edge and perimeter. If LBs need to come up big to support, then Wimsatt can throw the slants over the LBs.
Please do not for the love of God try and run off tackle!
In the end see Rochelle getting 7+ carries, AC 5+ carries, Saalam 5+ carries.
I think it was right getting rid of Gleeson, but honestly think this is a game where a "thinking" OC is at an advantage. This is not the game to "keep it simple". We need to find ways to exploit there unique situation (no DE and al DT).
Attach the perimeter on the run game, and do not be afraid to call longer developing pass plays, as MSU is really no threat to get a pass rush.
Last edited:
