He's a solid player. Anyone know why he is only grade as a mid second pick. He's a great shooter with long range and has enough size to play solid d and get his shot off. What am I missing?
He's a solid player. Anyone know why he is only grade as a mid second pick. He's a great shooter with long range and has enough size to play solid d and get his shot off. What am I missing?
Knock is not an explosive enough athlete (not my opinion just what I've heard)
I'm thrilled he's leaving because he is that good and his leaving is crushing to SHOE (and to SHOE fans, yes it is--you guys were easy sweet 16 picks for next year, now making the Dance is going to be a challenge). Yet he's not going in the 1st round, and 2nd round picks have a lot of work to do to stay in the league for more than cup of coffee.
Petty and childish -- great characteristics for someone, ostensibly over 40 years of age, to have. I wouldn't recommend spending your lunch money betting that RU MBB will beat Seton Hall any time soon.
Some people think I am crazy, but I think Isaiah's soph year was the best I have ever seen a SHU kid play. .
Some people think I am crazy, but I think Isaiah's soph year was the best I have ever seen a SHU kid play. He was great. Clearly imo superior to Dunn in the BE schedule. Other than the lack of explosiveness which is mentioned accurately above, I don't know what he lacks. (He could tighten up his handle.) He shot threes at around 42% in the BE, made some passes you wouldn't believe, played D great. In our opening BET game, he didn't play great. Then, in the last 90 seconds, he got a critical rebound, was fouled and made the shots, then he blocked the CU PG's shot in the paint and recovered it, got fouled and hit the shots, and for good measure, he got the next rebound too...whatever it takes. He was a Dean's List student too. And though so many blamed him (unfairly) for our problems last year, he kept his mouth shut, played through an average OOC, then exploded in the BE season.
But, his leaving though painful, is so far from crushing. We return four solid starters, and another F good enough to start. We lose Isaiah and Gordon. The rest of the returnees that play will be no more than Jrs this year. We bring in some good players and have a better kid on tap for the next season.
My biggest knock on Whitehead is understanding what a good shot is and what isn't.
NBA body-----athletic----plays hard----all that stuff is there.
Not for him they aren't----you and I yes but no for him
Some people think I am crazy, but I think Isaiah's soph year was the best I have ever seen a SHU kid play. He was great. Clearly imo superior to Dunn in the BE schedule. Other than the lack of explosiveness which is mentioned accurately above, I don't know what he lacks. (He could tighten up his handle.) He shot threes at around 42% in the BE, made some passes you wouldn't believe, played D great. In our opening BET game, he didn't play great. Then, in the last 90 seconds, he got a critical rebound, was fouled and made the shots, then he blocked the CU PG's shot in the paint and recovered it, got fouled and hit the shots, and for good measure, he got the next rebound too...whatever it takes. He was a Dean's List student too. And though so many blamed him (unfairly) for our problems last year, he kept his mouth shut, played through an average OOC, then exploded in the BE season.
But, his leaving though painful, is so far from crushing. We return four solid starters, and another F good enough to start. We lose Isaiah and Gordon. The rest of the returnees that play will be no more than Jrs this year. We bring in some good players and have a better kid on tap for the next season.[/QUOT
Let's not turn this into another pissing contest with Seton Hall, They lost a great player Rutgers would have loved to have. Right now, The Hall is a better program. Good luck to them. And goodluck to Whitehead.
Patrick - guy is a troll, probably NCAAballs in drag and that means from The Nova.Whats childish? That I can't stand SHOE's sport teams? Boo fracking hoo. Why should I want SHOE to win?
Yes I hope you lose. Sorry!
You Seton Hall people feeling disrespected--this is the Rutgers basketball board. Your own board displays far more animus towards Rutgers (remember all those Little Red Schoolhouse references) than we do towards SHOE. There are a few SHU posters that are here regularly, and add to the discussion, but to the soreheads--get lost.TL