From James Kratch at nj.com---https://www.nj.com/rutgersbasketbal...er-for-rutgers-basketball-mailbag-part-2.html
If I were a coach, that would seem to me more like a 6th man, Vinnie Johnson type role. Wouldn't want to start a guy that just chucks, but could be a good change of energy 5 to 10 minutes in.As I said before, I saw him playing five on five pick up for about a half hour with everyone on the team there except Kiss. He was lights out and looked like our best player, but we need another ball on the court because he shoots most every time he touches it.
He's starting.If I were a coach, that would seem to me more like a 6th man, Vinnie Johnson type role. Wouldn't want to start a guy that just chucks, but could be a good change of energy 5 to 10 minutes in.
I’m with you. My guess is he gets some starts but is a 6th man change of pace guy. He could easily be 2nd-3rd in scoring as the 6th man.If I were a coach, that would seem to me more like a 6th man, Vinnie Johnson type role. Wouldn't want to start a guy that just chucks, but could be a good change of energy 5 to 10 minutes in.
If I were a coach, that would seem to me more like a 6th man, Vinnie Johnson type role. Wouldn't want to start a guy that just chucks, but could be a good change of energy 5 to 10 minutes in.
Playing pick up is a whole different thing than playing for real.As I said before, I saw him playing five on five pick up for about a half hour with everyone on the team there except Kiss. He was lights out and looked like our best player, but we need another ball on the court because he shoots most every time he touches it.
No one predicted Souf was a starter come on...Can you imagine if we went back and saw all the posts over the past 5+ years taking about future roles of transfers and JUCO players. There were people who projected Souf as a starter.
No one predicted Souf was a starter come on...
I agree with FIG. There were definitely guys saying he would start.I wish I had the posts.
I agree with FIG. There were definitely guys saying he would start.
I can tell talent. As much as I like Mulcahy, Young starts FROM DAY 1.Playing pick up is a whole different thing than playing for real.
I wasn’t questioning his talent, was remarking on him throwing up a huge number of shots playing pick up. Your style of play is not necessarily going to be the same playing pick up as it will be when you’re ona real game situation.I can tell talent. As much as I like Mulcahy, Young starts FROM DAY 1.
I wasn’t questioning his talent, was remarking on him throwing up a huge number of shots playing pick up. Your style of play is not necessarily going to be the same playing pick up as it will be when you’re ona real game situation.
We shall see. We shall see.
How he fits onto a floor with four other players will be important. I am not saying he can't start. But if he is taking every shot and the ball isn't moving, that will be an issue for offensive chemistry. Especially if shots don't hit.
For some non-Rutgers 3P attempt per 40 min comparisons, here are the 12 B1G players who averaged at least 2.0 made threes per game this year:
9.6 - Carsen Edwards (.368)
8.2 - Trent Frazier (.378)
8.2 - Jordan Bohannon (.411)
8.1 - Myles Dread (.356)
7.8 - Ryan Cline (.407)
7.3 - Jordan Poole (.370)
6.8 - Gabe Kalscheur (.410)
6.3 - Matt McQuaid (.394)
6.2 - D'Mitrik Trice (.387)
5.7 - Cassius Winston (.433)
5.3 - Anthony Cowan (.344)
5.2 - Glynn Watson Jr (.349)
7.8 - Jacob Young (.271)
ProphetYoung is going to be better than the guys who think he will be terrible expect and worse than the people who think he is going to be great expect. He will have games where we think he is amazing and then a few games where he slumps so each side will be able to say they were right.
Yay.
Point taken.I wasn’t questioning his talent, was remarking on him throwing up a huge number of shots playing pick up. Your style of play is not necessarily going to be the same playing pick up as it will be when you’re ona real game situation.
We all know what a bad shooting percentage means but for you to self-select a dataset of players who have made two per game and compare it to Young who would not qualify as part of that dataset...is a bad data methodology. Almost by definition you have removed players who were starters this year.
You are then taking two years’ data for Young as the point of comparison. I’m not sure if you are trying to adjust for the sample size problem in some way by doing this, but this completely discounts what was a significant improvement in his percentage from 22.7% to 32.3%. When I see a jump like that, I think he “figured someth8ng out” either mentally, mechanically, or both.
Taken in tandem, it seems your choices are biased toward the “negative” here.
If I wanted to tell a “positive” story, I could be similarly biased in using the data to support my argument. For example, if we take the percentage YoY improvement in 3 pt percentage between his freshman and sophomore years (42.9%) and projecting a similar improvement to his junior season at Rutgers... he would finish with a 46.1% accuracy. This would be good for sixth in the country, #1 in power 5 and far outpace Ryan Cline’s B1G-leading 41.7%!
Comparing starters to role players is unfair to both groups of players because so much in basketball is about the rhythm and context of the game. A kid coming off the bench expected to provide scoring boost is different than a guy who can wait for good opportunities to come his way. On the other hand, he may benefit from not having to play as many minutes against the opponents starters.
If Young gets significant minutes (25) it will likely be because of his defensive ability and athleticism are warrant it in comparison with Mulcahy & Geo. I personally believe a player like him who needs the ball in his hands and shoots a lot needs more minutes to get a feel for the game and relax. If he can improve his 3 pt % to 35%, that would be on par with our two best shooters last year, McConnell & Geo. That’s a good thing.
Agreed. I know people say hes a pg but im telling you hes not. Hes the epitome of a sgNo, but if you read his h.s.recruiting profile and look at his stats from Texas, it’s clear he’s a shoot first guard. He’s not going to change into a table-setter overnight. If he makes his shots it won’t hurt chemistry, if he doesn’t and keeps doing it, it could. Only time will tell.