They just have to take away our joy. Football gods strike again!
Football LIVE GAME THREAD: Rutgers Football vs. Indiana
- Thread starter Richie O
- Start date
Bullshit call vs. what was called on the field - didn't look like it was incontrovertible evidence...
bs defintely wasn't irrefutable evidence
Last edited:
Only Rutgers could have the the greatest play of all time negated.
I cannot believe they called that back.
Well guys. It has been a pleasure sharing the game with you, as usual.
Jones is crying! That alone shows me how much they are invested! How much this team is all in under Schiano. Under Ash the players would have been smoking and joking after that overturn. I’ll take this for year 1 and we have a bright future ahead.
Only Rutgers could have the greatest play in the history of college football. And then have it overturned on the most unclear, NON indisputable call I’ve ever seen
His hand.. at teh point of release.. was well beyond the 35.. could easily have been the 36
Nearly as bad as the illegal man downfield on the fake FG against Louisville many years ago
I am certain we will once again lead the nation in official apologies and picked-up flags
Cost us the 2012 big east championship. I will never trust RU to win a close game ever when the refs still have a chance because of that game. Trauma
I mean odds are we don't recover another onside kick and score again, but god damn you needed to let that play stand as it was called on the field. You couldn't clearly tell if his hand was at the 35 or 36.
It's a one score game if RU makes the 2 pointer there. Looks like B1G didnt want to take that chance.
O'neal throwing it over his head like that was a heads up play...& hysterical
It was a hell of a freakish Athletic play by Jones.
We have athletes on this team.
As it happened, I said to myself that the lateral that they said was illegal looked too close for comfort, but on a number of replays, it was really hard to tell where his hand was when the ball left. On the other hand, I agree that forward progress on the big man would normally have been called on just about any other play in any other game.
Love watching a team that fights like a crazy person even when there's near zero chance to win.
I was thinking that the review guy at the Big Ten front office had money on Indy to cover.
For them to say it was the 35 to the 36 is just stupid. Because it was not. That's making stuff up to decide what you want. If they had simply said that it was forward.. without making up that it was released on the 35 then that might be fair.. but how you overturn on that is another issue. But to flat out say it was released on the 35 because you think you can say it was caught on the 36? That's dead wrong... with video evidence to prove it.
Hes becoming a national hero for that heave!!!!!
9 times out of 10, that replay would be inconclusive.
On Twitter they love the “bouquet toss” lmao
That is now two questionable replays in Indy's favor.. at a minimum. This one not game-deciding.. but it did decide bets.
maybe 3, someone else pointed out, did Langan cross the line on the 2 point?
They never showed a replay.. and I think it would have been an obvious thing to look at.. like the Indy near-TD/fumble.. where was the ball before he fumbled it... Langan did look like he reacted to dropping the ball iirc
I know . . . they showed the IU guy's hit to the head of our QB about 1000x!! There were literally NO good camera angles on anything, today. They have that roving overhead camera and sideline cameras, but not one for the IU TD where the side judges took about 10 minutes to run in from the sidelines to call a TD, and not one for the crazy play.
Refs were not going give RU any more chances to beat the team that just upset State Penn-on a very questionable call there to boot.
Similar threads
