Ted Williams was an AMerican Hero.
Flew with John Glenn in Korea
I would proudly wear his Jersey (If i liked Red SOx.....lol)
I apologize if it seemed like I was denigrating Williams as either a player or a person. Not my intent. Just saying him playing those last 2 games of 1941 was not about him being a "team" player.
FYI: He should have won the MVP in 1941, in my opinion. I think several BOSTON sportswriters left him off their MVP ballots ENTIRELY ... or at least 1 did ... crazy, if you think about it. Williams was clearly the best player in the majors that year ... and many other years. For what it is worth, no one nowadays ever places Dimaggio ahead of Williams in career evaluations ... Williams is always ranked ahead of Dimaggio, .and is usually in the top 5-6 all time ... as he rightly deserves. And if he had not served in the military for BOTH WW II, and then AGAIN in the Korean War, he would without any question be considered ONLY behind Ruth, Bonds and Mays all time ... and many, including me, have him there anyway ... though I am not sure how to evaluate Honus Wagner and Cobb versus Williams - very tough, not apples to apples.
Honus Wagner - played in a very different era (1897-2017): But led the league in WAR (now calculated) 11 times (8 in a row - 5 consecutive 9.0 or better, 2X 10 or better), 8X OPS leader, 7X Slugging average leader, 8X BA leader, 4X OBA leader ... all without ever hitting more than 10 HR in a season, and only hitting 10 HR 2X. Just a totally different era, but he was dominant. FYI, though by today's standards he probably was not a great fielder, in that era, with such poor gloves, etc., he had a DEFENSIVE WAR of 21 in his career, 6X at 2.0 or better ... that is pretty darned good (for comparison, Ozzie Smith, also a SS, had a defensive WAR career of 44, with 11X WAR of 2.0 or better - 8 in a row - and 5X defensive WAR of 3.0 or better).
Ty Cobb - also in a different era, though overlapped with the end of the dead ball era (1905-1928): Led the league in WAR 5X - all pre Babe Ruth's stardom - negative defensive WAR in almost every year, 10X OPS leader - including ONCE while Ruth was starring (in 1925), 8X Slugging average leader, 12X BA leader (all in a span of 13 years) - even in the dead ball era, though no BA titles, still averaged .360 in those 8 years with an OPS+ of 144, 7X OBA leader.
Ted Williams - "modern era" player, basically (1939-1960): Led the league in WAR 6X (fewer than Wagner, 1 more than Cobb FYI) - negative defensive WAR (though not as bad as Cobb) including only 1 season of positive defensive WAR (1955), 10X OPS leader, 9X Slugging average leader, 6X BA leader, 12X OBA leader ... and the 3 years he missed in WWII were truly in the middle of his best years, so it would seem likely he might have led the league in WAR, OPS, BA, SA and BA all or at least 2 of those 3 years ... and maybe also in the missed Korean War 2 seasons. For that reason I am comfortable rating him ahead of Wagner ... and probably regardless, ahead of Cobb. 2 MVPs - 7 other times top 5 MVP.
For comps:
Willie Mays - modern ball era, 10 years overlap with Williams, but in a different era, a bit - a true PITCHERS era (Williams' era was a HITTERS era) ... and Williams played in a band box, while Mays played his entire career in home stadiums that were literally the worst hitting stadiums in the majors, especially sapping of power stats (just saying) - and Mays missed 2 of his prime years for the Korean War: 10X WAR leader (6X 10.0 WAR or more - which is ridiculous, 9X 9.0 WAR or more) - 18.0 defensive WAR - sky high for an OF - Wagner was a SS, remember - Mays even led the league, all fielders, in Defensive WAR one year, as an OF (!!), 5X OPS leader, 5X Slugging leader, 2X OBA leader, 1X BA leader ... 12X Gold Glove winner, and in an era on the 1950's when NO ONE stole bases, ed the league in SB 4 straight seasons. And 2 MVPS, 7 other times in top 5 and 2 other times #6.
Barry Bonds - okay, yeah, steroids ... as a Giants and Bonds fan, I don't care, and ... by many accounts as many as HALF the players in that era (from 1998-2004, let's say) used steroids, including many pitchers, so I don't care ... besides he was great before he used steroids (his start was supposedly the year he got hurt, in 1999), a likely hall of famer even before: 11X WAR leader - positive defensive WAR (not as good as Mays, though) with 3X defensive WAR over 2.0 - very good for an OF, 9X OPS leader (including 5X before he supposedly took steroids - 16 consecutive seasons of 1.000+ OPS, including 8X before steroids, 7X slugging average leader (3 times pre-steroids), 10X OBA leader (4 X pre-steroids), 2X BA leader, 8X Gold Glove winner, 7X MVP (3X MVP pre-steroids in a span of 4 years - that 4th year he finished 2nd to Pendleton, when he should have won easily - lost by 15 points) - 7 other times in the top 5 in MVP voting.
My opinion of all time greats:
Top tier: Ruth, Mays and Barry Bonds, take your pick, depending what you value
Next Tier: Williams, Wagner, Cobb - Williams at the top of that tier
For reference, all time WAR leaders, career, have Williams only at 121 ish, #14 ... but you HAVE to assume the 5 years he missed he would have had at least 8.0 per year, or 40 additional WAR ... That would put him 3rd amongst hitters, just ahead of Mays and behind Ruth and Bonds. No offense, but I still put Mays ahead, sorry. The next hitters after Mays: Cobb, Aaron, Tris Speaker and Honus Wagner ... then followed by Musial (Ted Williams-lite), Hornsby and Eddie Collins (Wagner-lite).
Defensive WAR is a flawed stat, I know. Still, its a tool of evaluation. The 6 of the top 7 in career Defensive WAR, using baseball-reference's WAR, are all middle infielders, with Brooks Robinson at #3. Of the top 21, all are middle infielders other than Brooks Robinson (3B), Pudge (C), Yadier Molina (C), Beltre (3B), Gary Carter (C), Bob Boone (C), and Jim Sundberg (C). Andruw Jones has the most defensive WAR as an OF ... Paul Blair is the #2 career defensive WAR OF and Mays is #3 ... but no one actually thinks Blair was the better defender than Mays ... some do make a case Jones was better - and I would agree that was close, though I still give Mays the edge, having watched both of them.