ADVERTISEMENT

Northrop commercial

Because they're not just a "defense contractor" and advertising doesn't exist solely to sell product.
 
Your question was a fundamental troll. If you had any kind of perspective, whatsoever, my initial answer - that N-G isn't just a "defense contractor" and that companies don't advertise solely to sell product, would have been more than sufficient. Instead, you chose to double down on being obtuse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Section124
their technologies go beyond military applications, they have many applications in other markets, like IT, healthcare, etc, they have solid communication assets
 
Are they not a publicly traded company? To remind investors that they still have relevant products in development and other active product lines in rotation. They are still a relevant stock to own.
 
Northrop Grumman Corporation is publicly traded - NYSE
- while some might think it a waste of money, there are corporations that will run corporate identity advertising for the purposes of increasing awareness in the greater investor community.
It is a little like those general corporate image ads that are running on TV now for GE - the ones with the guy who is telling his friends & family that he has gotten a job with GE as a "developer" - and how he will work on product for healthcare , transportation, communications .
 
  • Like
Reactions: theRU
After doing some quick research i found that out, however their commercial seemed to be focused on their aircraft/defense work. If the intent is to get people to research the company to find out that they do more, i still think the advertising isn't effective....the only reason i looked them up was to figure out what they hell they're doing adverting in the first place in order to discuss it for this post. Unless most viewers react the same way I did, but I would guess that they would not.
just like the GE commercials, general PR, publicity, especially if a public company
 
Political in support of their next generation bomber contract they won over the team of Lockmart and Boeing. It is an add to get their name out there and make sure people know who they are. It helps them in protecting the award over the expected protest of the contract. Don't ask me how I know but it's true.
 
another example - those ads where -
IBM's Watson Talks Love and Loss With Bob Dylan

some may find it odd - since IBM has exited the consumer market - some may ask who is their audience?
 
  • Like
Reactions: theRU
Political in support of their next generation bomber contract they won over the team of Lockmart and Boeing. It is an add to get their name out there and make sure people know who they are. It helps them in protecting the award over the expected protest of the contract. Don't ask me how I know but it's true.

I could buy that as a good reason to advertise.
 
I'm doubling down in my efforts to continuously challenge the "holier than thou" types on this board who storm into threads and continually disrespect posters. My question still stands....what do they stand to gain from this type of advertising? How could it possibly benefit them vs saving the money and using other avenues.

Instead of possibly answering with your opinion on what you feel the positives are, instead you came in with a condescending tone and proved that you are just an a-hole.

Good day

So let's see... you've now gone through two specific incidents of name calling ("d-bag", "a-hole"), and all I did was - in your opinion - not answer your question to your satisfaction?

And I'm the one with the problem?

I probably should have simply pointed out that you had a hidden (but poorly disguised) agenda in asking the question, and left it at that. But no matter.

Others have correctly pointed out N-G's business diversity. To their point, I will add this - the primary target of their ad campaign is their future workforce. Football broadcasts are a good place to reach that demographic.
 
Google - "Long Lifecycle Issues for Defense Contractors" is you'll learn. Costs of buying Ads (even a superbowl ad, as Northrop has done in the past) - is minuscule vs. the potential benefit of having brand awareness in the minds of any decision maker in the military-industrial complex's production chain.
 
So let's see... you've now gone through two specific incidents of name calling ("d-bag", "a-hole"), and all I did was - in your opinion - not answer your question to your satisfaction?

And I'm the one with the problem?

I probably should have simply pointed out that you had a hidden (but poorly disguised) agenda in asking the question, and left it at that. But no matter.

Others have correctly pointed out N-G's business diversity. To their point, I will add this - the primary target of their ad campaign is their future workforce. Football broadcasts are a good place to reach that demographic.

There are plenty of companies like NG that don't advertise, so the benefits of advertising aren't as obvious as you want to make it seem.
 
There are plenty of companies like NG that don't advertise, so the benefits of advertising aren't as obvious as you want to make it seem.

I'm curious to know which companies you have in mind.

GE advertises - in fact, they've had recent campaigns touting the fact that they are the world's leading manufacturer of jet engines. To the OP's point, why would anyone care that GE manufactures jet engines?

Lockheed Martin has run TV ads in the recent past, as well. Off the top of my head, I don't think that General Dynamics has advertised on television per se, but they have run ads for Gulfstream, which is one of their subsidiary operations.
 
I'm curious to know which companies you have in mind.

GE advertises - in fact, they've had recent campaigns touting the fact that they are the world's leading manufacturer of jet engines. To the OP's point, why would anyone care that GE manufactures jet engines?

Lockheed Martin has run TV ads in the recent past, as well. Off the top of my head, I don't think that General Dynamics has advertised on television per se, but they have run ads for Gulfstream, which is one of their subsidiary operations.

I was thinking GD, Raytheon, Lockheed (I didn't recall seeing adds by them but maybe I'm wrong).
 
I was thinking GD, Raytheon, Lockheed (I didn't recall seeing adds by them but maybe I'm wrong).

Lockheed Martin has definitely run TV ads in the recent past - their "We're engineering a better tomorrow" campaign might ring a bell.

You're probably right about Raytheon. They're a pretty dark operation, overall.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT