Not Sorry, Duggan is a Douche

[newell138]

Today he has 3 separate articles on spring game attendance.

 

[WhiteBus]

Today he has 3 separate articles on spring game attendance.

He really has one. He is credited for two that are just a compilations from all media sourse.

And where's the negative?

Rutgers spring game attendance may have dipped a bit this year, but the turnout for the Scarlet Knights' annual intrasquad scrimmage remained in the middle of the pack in the Big Ten.

Actually it's a positive spin

 

[GoodOl'Rutgers]

don't like the truth?

he's using the last line to show why coaches stress over the break

He could have said

"The short break at the end of the semester is a stressful time for coaches. Many teams have had players charged with felonies while home for break" .

He starts with a general comment about stress for "coaches", but then directs it to Rutgers only. I also know the felony charges against Nelson, a transfer from Minnesota who had yet to suit up on gameday for Rutgers, were dropped and he saw no jail time.

Again, this is about the S-L wanting to perpetuate the myth that Rutgers football recruits thugs. Anyone here remember when the S-L wanted to turn misdemeanor bending of a street sign late one summer night into a thug culture charge against Schiano teams?

 

[WhiteBus]

He could have said

"The short break at the end of the semester is a stressful time for coaches. Many teams have had players charged with felonies while home for break" .

He starts with a general comment about stress for "coaches", but then directs it to Rutgers only. I also know the felony charges against Nelson, a transfer from Minnesota who had yet to suit up on gameday for Rutgers, were dropped and he saw no jail time.

Again, this is about the S-L wanting to perpetuate the myth that Rutgers football recruits thugs. Anyone here remember when the S-L wanted to turn misdemeanor bending of a street sign late one summer night into a thug culture charge against Schiano teams?

He might have written that way if he needed to be politically correct for the crybabies on here. But what he wrote was fine for 99.99999% of those who read it.
Those on here that complain about these type things are worse than the Star Ledger. You nit pick every little line to find something you can turn into a negative. You do the exact same thing that you accuse what the SL does. Take something out of context and turn it into a negative
If you don't like what they write, don't read it. Plain and simple.

 

[Purple-Ed]

He might have written that way if he needed to be politically correct for the crybabies on here. But what he wrote was fine for 99.99999% of those who read it.
Those on here that complain about these type things are worse than the Star Ledger. You nit pick every little line to find something you can turn into a negative. You do the exact same thing that you accuse what the SL does. Take something out of context and turn it into a negative
If you don't like what they write, don't read it. Plain and simple.

Amen.