Most recent I read was 1978. The Third World War: August 1985 by General Sir John Hackett.
Remember that. Of course by then you had attack helicopters involved on the battlefield as well.
Most recent I read was 1978. The Third World War: August 1985 by General Sir John Hackett.
Not "Russia" but the "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics." Their military build up made for terrific hardships across the republics, which ultimately led, of course, to the breakup of the USSR. The USA, by contrast, was able to contract its forces following the war yet remain very capable militarily. Our economy and our citizens did not suffer any such hardships. We thrived.Those books were written in the 50s and early 60s, right?? Not that the US had the stomach to extend the war to go against one our our allies but the day that Japan surrendered the US started reducing our forces and ended the build up of weapons. Russia did the reverse. They kept building their war machine. By 1949 they had the bomb and the Cold War was on.
The SKS was the precursor to the AK, using the same cartridge and an internal 10-round box magazine. Pretty effective weapon in its own right.A few years too early for that.
Three key requirements to wage "Total war" successfully: men, money, material. Need all three. USSR was lacking in the "money" department and in "material" to some degree. Modern China, though, has all three....What difference would a navy make? Better weapons? In some areas, but definitely not tanks. Wasn't the AK in use back then? Take that over the M-1 any day of the week. And YOU said Patton was just going just going to continue on from the Elbe.
Three key requirements to wage "Total war" successfully: men, money, material. Need all three. USSR was lacking in the "money" department and in "material" to some degree. Modern China, though, has all three....
And it wouldn't have been just the US...a reconstituted French army plus the British and any partisans from Poland and Ukrain would have helped...at least shared some of the burden.
I was born 1 yr later. My Dad was drafted into the navy 2 yrs later. Called him "pop" at 27 or 28 yrs old. Saw a great deal of action on a destroyer at Iwo Jima & Okinawa & other battles, and through 2 typhons.Remembering the brave, humble, courageous Americans of the era.
My dad, the son of Italian immigrants and didn’t speak much English was one of them
Do you guys listen to any good military podcasts? Besides hardcore history (which is awesome btw) what else do you guys listen to?
First Stalan did nothing to help the US with Japan. Only after we dropped the bomb did Russia go for a land grab of Japanese held territory. He didn't plan to invade the island but just conquer more land.Uncle Joe Stalin promised Roosevelt that he would commit a big force to invade Japan. The Japanese's military and civilian population were going to make our troops pay dearly for every square foot of soil we took on the mainland. We were tired of the carnage suffered by our troops on Iwo, Pelilou, Okinowa and the kamakazi raids. Stalin didn't care how many of his troops would have been killed or maimed during the invasion of Japan. Invading Russia was therefore out of the question at that time.
First I've ever heard that: do you know what they involved?However the British wouldn't go along as Stalan and Churchill had secret deals on certain territories.
There are many stories on this in books and articles as well documentaries.First I've ever heard that: do you know what they involved?
First I've ever heard that: do you know what they involved?
The Kurile islands are still in dispute as of today. Russia controls them, Japan consider them occupied.There have been credible rumors of a side deal at Yalta and Potsdam, but it was mainly about what later became the Warsaw Pact countries and the UK presence in the Middle East. The only thing that affected Japan was the promise of Stalin to attack Japanese forces in Manchuria within, I believe, 3 months of the surrender of Germany. Of course by the end of 3 months the US had the bomb so it turned out to be a bad move. Stalin was only too willing to make a land grab and at the same time be in a position to provide arms to Mao. He also had his sights on the Kurile Islands but Japan surrendered too fast for that to happen.
Not that long ago.
Especially if your mom and dad or grandparents fought or contributed to the war effort from home.
It’s very important my teenage daughters know Grandpa fought at DDay, Southern Italy and Northern Africa
I believe I previously mentioned in an earlier thread that my father landed on Omaha Beach in one the very early waves, and my mother worked with the group that broke the Japanese Code. One of things that bothers me is that younger generations don't seem to appreciate or understand how different their lives would be without the greatest generation. Hell, a lot of older people don't seem to get it as well.Not that long ago.
Especially if your mom and dad or grandparents fought or contributed to the war effort from home.
It’s very important my teenage daughters know Grandpa fought at DDay, Southern Italy and Northern Africa
My dad was in the Army Air Corp based in Tinian and flew many bombing missions over Japan on a B-29. I have some of his medals on a bookshelf, along with his leather cap, and Sun glasses. I also have his officer’s dress cap, dress uniform, and flight jacket. Also have his trunk that was sent back at the end of the War with scores of pictures, navigation tools, records of his missions, etc. I have saved these for my grown kids and have told them to donate them or some portion if they choose to do so at some point (I hope thing on to at least some of the artifacts. ) “A date which will live in infamy”My father was stationed in Pearl Harbor as a young officer. Here is my favorite photo of him strolling down a street in PH about a week before it was attacked. He ended becoming a Lt, Cmdr and was part of Adm Nimitz staff. He had a ton of photos that we donated to the Library of Congress.