So when RU diverts funding from the General Fund and other academic funding sources and loans in order to fund an athletic department
Bold part is not true, but thanks for trying.
So when RU diverts funding from the General Fund and other academic funding sources and loans in order to fund an athletic department
Certainly a bank account that the university would otherwise use to support academics and research...
Is JCKnight a Rutgers fan or is he's just here as a typical NJ stink-starter... ABR?
Is JCKnight a Rutgers fan or is he's just here as a typical NJ stink-starter... ABR?
JC Knight=Agent of the Cult
You don’t think there were conversations goin in between PSU and the NCAA?I wasn't putting words in your mouth directly. I have seen other Rutgers comments say just that, that Rutgers would shut down the program if Sandusky had happened there. It's a ridiculous take.
In terms of PSU's strategy, it was pretty clear from the get-go that there wasn't much of a strategy at all. The Board of Trustees put on a master class in how not to handle a scandal. I have no desire to dig into all of the ways things could have been handled better, from start to finish, as it accomplishes nothing. My point was only that PSU did not actively work to reduce the sanctions, as you suggested.
You don’t think there were conversations goin in between PSU and the NCAA?
legislators to get involved
Bullshit. Student fees are levied to support non-academic student activities.
The "university bank" that the loan came from is otherwise known as the university's investment portfolio.
You've gone from ridiculous to stupid, so I'm done with you.
Why are you even debating where the money comes from? It is a trap argument. His original premise, that because Rutgers spends money on athletics, that means they put athletics above academic, is false. Even if 100% of the athletic budget came from general university sources, his premise would be false.
Rutgers spends money on a ton of things: classroom education, research support, libraries, landscaping, student centers, intramural sports, intercollegiate athletics, student activities and clubs, etc.
Just because Rutgers funds multiple things, doesn't mean that each activity is a top priority. Rutgers funds a lounge in the student center. That doesn't mean that Rutgers puts lounging above landscaping, or that Rutgers puts lounging and landscaping above academics.
His argument is as idiotic as saying that since I bought a TV, I put television above feeding my family.
No, they absolutely should have existed. Stop excusing those responsible for the most reprehensible scandal in sports history. This is about protecting children!Look, the sanctions were reduced and ultimately killed for a number of reasons, from the fact that they shouldn't have existed in the first place to the NCAA's overreach causing legislators to get involved.
Thank god you can go away now...yes you are right Rutgers clearly puts academics above sports unlike every other institution...whatever makes you feel betterBullshit. Student fees are levied to support non-academic student activities.
The "university bank" that the loan came from is otherwise known as the university's investment portfolio.
You've gone from ridiculous to stupid, so I'm done with you.
You clowns are funny...anyone with a dissenting opinion is a spy here to change your way of thinking...apparently no one wants to hear that Rutgers also places sports above academics, we just do not do it as efficiently or effectively as our conference brethren...JC Knight=Agent of the Cult
Thank god you can go away now...yes you are right Rutgers clearly puts academics above sports unlike every other institution...whatever makes you feel better
PA legislators will come to SPU's aid/rescue because either they are alums, have affinity, are fans, it's good for business/votes to be pro-Crappy Valley, etc.
As a comparison, Rutgers isn't likely to get that type of support from NJ legislators at large, even if Rutgers is being unfairly maligned.
No, they absolutely should have existed. Stop excusing those responsible for the most reprehensible scandal in sports history. This is about protecting children!
Right, because our administration reacted immediately when a professor accuses Kyle flood of trying to change a players grades to keep him eligible...nope it was only after the shit hit the fan and Flood was clearly on his way out that he was reprimanded and suspendedSorry, champ, but you'll be the one going away. And if you genuinely believe that RU puts athletics above academics then the place you're going will probably have nice, soft walls.
JC Knight=Agent of the Cult
Indeed.I've been telling you all this for a while now about JCKnight, but some of chosen to ignore it. He is a Pedd man through and through ... ignore at your own risk.
LoL physically assaulting basketball players?!? Physically assaulting?!? Did Mike Rice ever have assault charges filed against him...your Defensive coordinator was rapiing 10-year old boys in the ass IN THE FOOTBALL FACILITIES! And your head coach knew about it and did nothing!!! And your university President!!! That warrants a death penalty, in football and in lifeOur basketball coach was physically assaulting basketball players...did we drop the hammer on the entire program? From what I have read the PSU trustees accepted the heavy NCAA sanctions without a proper NCAA review...I’m not sure how that is then said to be trying to sliver out of sanctions...
Your other point I’m not sure the relevance to the arguement...That’s a small error margin that I think most well controlled organizations might accept given the cost benefit analysis...did any of those non vetted counselors cause issues?
That was just deflecting talk about Penn St knowing children were being molested by someone in the PSU organization and deciding the football program's image was more important than protecting children.LoL physically assaulting basketball players?!? Physically assaulting?!? Did Mike Rice ever have assault charges filed against him...your Defensive coordinator was rapiing 10-year old boys in the ass IN THE FOOTBALL FACILITIES! And your head coach knew about it and did nothing!!! And your university President!!! That warrants a death penalty, in football and in life
Whoa? You need to get your facts straight on the loan. It came from the University bank and the amount was for $6.1 mil. at 5.75%. This higher rate was deemed what the University could make if they invested it in outside ventures. So the University invested it in Athletics. By time the loan is scheduled for completion of payment interest on said loan will net the University bank $17.6 mil. So athletics is making the University money. How is that taking money from students mouths?How can you say student fees and especially a university loan are not taking away from money allocated toward academics? Where do you think this loan comes from?..
Right, because our administration reacted immediately when a professor accuses Kyle flood of trying to change a players grades to keep him eligible...nope it was only after the shit hit the fan and Flood was clearly on his way out that he was reprimanded and suspended
And he also needs to get his facts right. Flood never asked the adjunct professor to change the grade: he asked him if there was any extra credit work the athlete could do to bring his grade up.I think your timing might be off a tiny bit.
Flood's meeting with the professor in Princeton occurred on Aug 5.
The encounter was reported to the University compliance office on Aug 12. Rutgers retained Saiber on Aug 13 to conduct an independent investigation. Saiber completed the report of their investigation on Sept 15 and the University suspended Flood for 3 games on Sept 16.
Notice this thread has gone from being Penn St related into one that Rutgers fans are being forced to defend their school because of the misinformation being spread about Rutgers in order to stop this thread from being about the President of Penn St being convicted of child endangerment and Penn St trying to keep the public from knowing it had an employee that had been molesting children since the 70s.Is JCKnight a Rutgers fan or is he's just here as a typical NJ stink-starter... ABR?
That's how they do it: deflect, deflect, deflect.Notice this thread has gone from being Penn St related into one that Rutgers fans are being forced to defend their school because of the misinformation being spread about Rutgers in order to stop this thread from being about the President of Penn St being convicted of child endangerment and Penn St trying to keep the public from knowing it had an employee that had been molesting children since the 70s.
You have to feel sorry for Ped fans like @JCKnight. He spends his life sucking on the alter of Joe, and because of one little child rape scandal, he has to deal with the fact that some people don't hold the "honor" in high esteem.That's how they do it: deflect, deflect, deflect.
I thought he was a one of the good guys. But after this discussion and his vehement defense of psu I'm not so sure. I mean, what true Rutgers fan would defend that school? Plus exaggerating facts to paint Rutgers in a bad light? Doesn't sound like a Rutgers fan to me.Is JCKnight a Rutgers fan or is he's just here as a typical NJ stink-starter... ABR?
Appalling stuff. This is about CHILDREN, not football. JCKnight should be banned.I thought he was a one of the good guys. But after this discussion and his vehement defense of psu I'm not so sure. I mean, what true Rutgers fan would defend that school? Plus exaggerating facts to paint Rutgers in a bad light? Doesn't sound like a Rutgers fan to me.
The cult wishes it was "one little child rape scandal" that would be easier to claim it was a few not the whole school covering up children being sexual assaulted for years.You have to feel sorry for Ped fans like @JCKnight. He spends his life sucking on the alter of Joe, and because of one little child rape scandal, he has to deal with the fact that some people don't hold the "honor" in high esteem.
Spoken like a Floodie!!!And he also needs to get his facts right. Flood never asked the adjunct professor to change the grade: he asked him if there was any extra credit work the athlete could do to bring his grade up.
If that is true, it is very disappointing.While I despise everything PSU, I have zero doubt the B1G was integral in getting their sanctions reduced. As much as we hate it, a strong PSU is important for the B1G
I don't think the B1G had much to do with the reduction of sanctions. My understanding is similar to that of ZMR.While I despise everything PSU, I have zero doubt the B1G was integral in getting their sanctions reduced. As much as we hate it, a strong PSU is important for the B1G
I don't think the B1G had much to do with the reduction of sanctions. My understanding is similar to that of ZMR.
You will recall that as part of the original sanctions, PSU agreed to donate $60M to child abuse charities. The PA legislature passed a law that the entire amount had to be expended within the State of Pennsylvania. In an incredible fit of stupidity, the NCAA sued PA to prevent this restriction. This gave the PA pols legal standing to countersue. Which they gleefully did, challenging the NCAA's jurisdiction to impose the sanctions in the first place. The NCAA got cold feet and caved.
It is likely that the B1G was among the voices urging the NCAA to cave. But it would have never happened without the decision to countersue.
Oh, how admirable. Give me a break.It's also worth noting, for anyone who might not know, that Penn State Athletics continued to pay the $60 million fine in support of child-abuse prevention, despite the "on-field" sanctions being rolled back.
Oh, how admirable. Give me a break.