ADVERTISEMENT

OT: LaVar Ball

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jim_from_RU

Heisman Winner
Jul 30, 2001
12,050
9,356
113
I've never seen a bigger douchebag than him. Not only living vicariously through his son's fame, but he's an attention whore too. Unreal. If I were Lonzo, I'd tell dad to take a long timeout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: We Are RU
I really hope we don't turn this into the Football Board with 100 OT topics a week.

Please, let's keep it confined to Rutgers Basketball, B1G Basketball and other college basketball issues to discuss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ray6232010
He is annoying and his sneakers are a joke. Lonzo will be a target in nba
 
This behavior will eventually come back to haunt his son.
 
Keeping his name out there using his sons might be more about business than just being an a$$#0le.
Most articles mentioning him also mention his sneaker brand, keeping the name out there even if it's not selling.
 
Yeah. His wife is white and his kids are half white. Not really sure he's a racist.

Embarrassment yes.

Sounds like the ole, "but I have black friends" thing that upsets people.

His statements stand on their own. If someone not of his background said similar things they would be eliminated from the spotlight and shunned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YoUnG-Ru-FaN-FL
I've never seen a bigger douchebag than him. Not only living vicariously through his son's fame, but he's an attention whore too. Unreal. If I were Lonzo, I'd tell dad to take a long timeout.
He MADE HIS SON'S!!!! How can a father live through his son's?????
 
I've never seen a bigger douchebag than him. Not only living vicariously through his son's fame, but he's an attention whore too. Unreal. If I were Lonzo, I'd tell dad to take a long timeout.

Agreed! He is a:

32314961492_4e585f9bb8_m.jpg
 
He is a sexist. Saw him deliberately ignore Christine Leahy when he appeared on the Cowherd show--turned his back on her and wouldn't answer a legitimate question or even acknowledge her presence. Guess he thinks like Stokely Carmichael, who was once asked what position women have in the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and responded "Prone".
The posters that feel he is racist attribute it to his comments that UCLA would have won more if they didn't have so many slow white boys. Dumb attention-seeking comment, but certainly not evidence of racism. There are physical reasons that enable black athletes, with 1/8 the population, to dominate college and NBA hoops. Mr Ball is not entirely wrong.
TL
 
The posters that feel he is racist attribute it to his comments that UCLA would have won more if they didn't have so many slow white boys. Dumb attention-seeking comment, but certainly not evidence of racism. There are physical reasons that enable black athletes, with 1/8 the population, to dominate college and NBA hoops. Mr Ball is not entirely wrong.
TL


Didn't Jimmy The Greek lose a career for that line of thinking?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's a genius, the only reason there's a thread about him on a Rutgers basketball board. He's used the system to boost his profile, and become a household name in a few months. He's gonna have all the rich white kids buying his shoes, while cutting out the middle man. As long as his kids can play, his brand will be relevant, and he's got a major cash flow, rather than getting a percentage from Nike or Adidas
 
Last edited:
He is a sexist. Saw him deliberately ignore Christine Leahy when he appeared on the Cowherd show--turned his back on her and wouldn't answer a legitimate question or even acknowledge her presence. Guess he thinks like Stokely Carmichael, who was once asked what position women have in the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and responded "Prone".
The posters that feel he is racist attribute it to his comments that UCLA would have won more if they didn't have so many slow white boys. Dumb attention-seeking comment, but certainly not evidence of racism. There are physical reasons that enable black athletes, with 1/8 the population, to dominate college and NBA hoops. Mr Ball is not entirely wrong.
TL

Exhibit A why this thread should be locked down and/or deleted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrh51 and Russ Wood
The fact that there is a thread about the ball family on a Rutgers basketball board is proof his approach worked.

I personally think he is hilarious.
 
[QUOTE="The posters that feel he is racist attribute it to his comments that UCLA would have won more if they didn't have so many slow white boys. Dumb attention-seeking comment, but certainly not evidence of racism. There are physical reasons that enable black athletes, with 1/8 the population, to dominate college and NBA hoops. Mr Ball is not entirely wrong.
TL


Didn't Jimmy The Greek lose a career for that line of thinking?[/QUOTE]

If memory serves, Jimmy the Greek said blacks were better athletes because of selective breeding in the era of slavery, and that the only role left for whites was coaching. And now, black coaches were starting to make inroads. That got him fired.
There are physical differences between whites and blacks--better twitch muscles, etc. And some 30 years ago, a black gal in the office commented to me about another black gal's butt and said that on the whole, black women had larger butts.
She used a scientific term I can't remember, and said it made child bearing easier, so the trait was passed on.
The problem comes when people start saying that these physical differences suggest there are mental differences, which is completely bogus. Just like people used to say Jim McMillan (look him up) played white and Pete Maravich played black. Saw UCLA many times on TV, especially when wacky Bill Walton was doing the games. Lavar was thinking of TJ Leaf and Bryce Alford, neither of whom featured speed as one of their assets. And a few subs. Of course, Lavar conveniently forgot the other skills like scoring, passing and rebounding those two collectively brought to the table.
TL
 
Is Alonzo really that good? I am sorry, but I don't see anything special about his level of play. For the record, I think MJ could beat him 1 on 1 now.
 
No. As a Lakers fan, it's a meh pick. Totally underwhelming amongst the fanbase here.
 
The guy is a racist and national embarrassment.
You can tell by his white wife and mixed race kids that he can't stand white people. Must be a passive-aggressive procreation racism.

On another note, he should have spent less time promoting overpriced sneakers and more time teaching his son how to defend a ball screen. Kentucky reduced him to ash in that tournament game with that play. If DeAaron Fox got 39, Steph Curry might score 70.
 
You can tell by his white wife and mixed race kids that he can't stand white people. Must be a passive-aggressive procreation racism.

On another note, he should have spent less time promoting overpriced sneakers and more time teaching his son how to defend a ball screen. Kentucky reduced him to ash in that tournament game with that play. If DeAaron Fox got 39, Steph Curry might score 70.

Once they get LiAngelo on the Lakers they won't have to worry about defense when he scores 90 ppg
 
You can tell that the former owner of the Clippers wasn't a racist because he employed black people and had an Asian girlfriend.
He also fired black people in bad faith and disciminated against them in housing. He also popped a gasket when his Asian girlfriend was out in public with Magic Johnson.
 
Who is Ball hiring? Ball popped a gasket when his son lost and blamed in on the white guys.

He is a racist. Not sure why you are arguing the obvious. It's ok to admit what is clear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT