ADVERTISEMENT

OT Rutgers Staff Mandated to get Vaccinated

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are they mandating their staff to get healthy as well? For people to stop eating like crap and get off their butts and move?
That needs to be mandated too.

#IStillHaveAntibodies
My body is doing what it was made to do.
Yeah Baby!
 
In before the silly debate.
ClassicUniformGerbil-size_restricted.gif
 
Public employees with no religious exemption? Biden's executive order may well meet the same fate as Trump's early 1st year order denying visa's to Muslim's when it gets to the USSC. Twice a week testing, hell, three times a week would pass muster. People who had worn "I'm atheist and I'm proud" badge probably could be challenged. I don't think this will pass judicial review.

Written by a twice vaxxed poster who will get a booster when 6 months has passed after Jab 2
 
Are they mandating their staff to get healthy as well? For people to stop eating like crap and get off their butts and move?
That needs to be mandated too.
Actually, companies are kinda sorta doing that these days. Not mandating, per-se, but offering large discounts on employee premiums for doing wellness stuff. Makes sense for the companies doing it, and their employees, and the insurance companies.

But eating right and getting regular checkups is an individual thing - if we fail to do those healthy things and, say, become hypertensive or diabetic, we're not putting others at risk of exposure to those things, right?

Whereas, in the case of Covid-19, a mandate is appropriate in many circumstances because it's not just us choosing to take care of ourselves (or not), it's also about taking care of our coworkers, or patients, or students, etc. whom we put at greater risk of a deadly infection by going unvaccinated.

And in a more general sense, it's about trying to lower the potential for new and more deadly variants which benefits us all.

And, as always with the mandates, people are free to not get vaccinated. They just aren't free to decide to increase the risk of infection for others.
 
Actually, companies are kinda sorta doing that these days. Not mandating, per-se, but offering large discounts on employee premiums for doing wellness stuff. Makes sense for the companies doing it, and their employees, and the insurance companies.

But eating right and getting regular checkups is an individual thing - if we fail to do those healthy things and, say, become hypertensive or diabetic, we're not putting others at risk of exposure to those things, right?

Whereas, in the case of Covid-19, a mandate is appropriate in many circumstances because it's not just us choosing to take care of ourselves (or not), it's also about taking care of our coworkers, or patients, or students, etc. whom we put at greater risk of a deadly infection by going unvaccinated.

And in a more general sense, it's about trying to lower the potential for new and more deadly variants which benefits us all.

And, as always with the mandates, people are free to not get vaccinated. They just aren't free to decide to increase the risk of infection for others.

Carrots are fine. Sticks not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DennisHajekRC84
Actually, companies are kinda sorta doing that these days. Not mandating, per-se, but offering large discounts on employee premiums for doing wellness stuff. Makes sense for the companies doing it, and their employees, and the insurance companies.

But eating right and getting regular checkups is an individual thing - if we fail to do those healthy things and, say, become hypertensive or diabetic, we're not putting others at risk of exposure to those things, right?

Whereas, in the case of Covid-19, a mandate is appropriate in many circumstances because it's not just us choosing to take care of ourselves (or not), it's also about taking care of our coworkers, or patients, or students, etc. whom we put at greater risk of a deadly infection by going unvaccinated.

And in a more general sense, it's about trying to lower the potential for new and more deadly variants which benefits us all.

And, as always with the mandates, people are free to not get vaccinated. They just aren't free to decide to increase the risk of infection for others.
stop making sense. that's not allowed in this debate.
 
Carrots are fine. Sticks not.
Both are fine under the right circumstances.

I would object to a mandate for the general population. Because you can't quit the general population.

But for people who regularly come into contact with students and other faculty, or with patients or other caregivers, they always have the right to refuse the vaccine, but they do not have the right to increase the risks of everybody at work around them.
 
That's why it's expressed as increased risk. You have the right to increase your own risk of serious illness and death. You do not have the right to increase my risk.

What part of that don't you understand?
agreed.

especially as the coaching staff goes to potential recruit homes where they may have contact with elderly family members or immune compromised ones.

It's a pretty selfish and immoral decision to NOT get vaccinated and then continue to interact with people outside your immediate family. You'd have to be a sociopath/psychopath to do this (I do know there are some on this board).
 
Actually, companies are kinda sorta doing that these days. Not mandating, per-se, but offering large discounts on employee premiums for doing wellness stuff. Makes sense for the companies doing it, and their employees, and the insurance companies.

But eating right and getting regular checkups is an individual thing - if we fail to do those healthy things and, say, become hypertensive or diabetic, we're not putting others at risk of exposure to those things, right?

Whereas, in the case of Covid-19, a mandate is appropriate in many circumstances because it's not just us choosing to take care of ourselves (or not), it's also about taking care of our coworkers, or patients, or students, etc. whom we put at greater risk of a deadly infection by going unvaccinated.

And in a more general sense, it's about trying to lower the potential for new and more deadly variants which benefits us all.

And, as always with the mandates, people are free to not get vaccinated. They just aren't free to decide to increase the risk of infection for others.

That seems to be the whole problem with those fighting the vax. They like to think/argue/delude themselves that it's solely to protect the receiver, and therefore they don't need it because they are so healthy and awesome. But it's not meant solely to protect the receiver, nor have vaccines ever been. Which is why this one is neither the first nor last to be mandated.
 
Last I looked vaccinated people spread the virus also.
Last I looked there are still many mass shootings in Texas (waaay more than NJ by any measure). They have open and conceal carry laws.

see how this works?
 
That's why it's expressed as increased risk. You have the right to increase your own risk of serious illness and death. You do not have the right to increase my risk.

What part of that don't you understand?
Not sure that there is fully vetted data to support "increased risk." See link below.

I'm sure you know that unvaccinated people are more likely to spread the virus than the unvaccinated. So please stop with the bad faith posts.
You used unvaccinated twice.

In any event, with Delta, things are not so simple.
That said, however, being vaccinated is a good thing to do.

 
Actually, companies are kinda sorta doing that these days. Not mandating, per-se, but offering large discounts on employee premiums for doing wellness stuff. Makes sense for the companies doing it, and their employees, and the insurance companies.

But eating right and getting regular checkups is an individual thing - if we fail to do those healthy things and, say, become hypertensive or diabetic, we're not putting others at risk of exposure to those things, right?

Whereas, in the case of Covid-19, a mandate is appropriate in many circumstances because it's not just us choosing to take care of ourselves (or not), it's also about taking care of our coworkers, or patients, or students, etc. whom we put at greater risk of a deadly infection by going unvaccinated.

And in a more general sense, it's about trying to lower the potential for new and more deadly variants which benefits us all.

And, as always with the mandates, people are free to not get vaccinated. They just aren't free to decide to increase the risk of infection for others.
Of course you're all ok with starting mandatory flu vaccines going forward now too, right? Everybody getting temps taken or scanned walking thru the office doors. Metal detecting too as guns kill people.
Imagine the uproar if Aids testing was required years ago. Shocking how "my body my choice" only works in some circumstances.
I'm boosted..not anti vax .
 
Not sure that there is fully vetted data to support "increased risk." See link below.


You used unvaccinated twice.

In any event, with Delta, things are not so simple.
That said, however, being vaccinated is a good thing to do.


Three of the things in article that need to be considered:

>The researchers stressed that vaccination still offers good protection against catching the disease in the first place, and protects against getting seriously ill with it.<

>"The fact that they [fully vaccinated people] can have high levels of virus suggests that people who aren't yet vaccinated may not be as protected from the Delta variant as we hoped," Walker told the British newspaper. "It comes back to this concept of herd immunity, and the hope that the unvaccinated could be protected if we could vaccinate enough people. But I suspect the higher levels of the virus in vaccinated people are consistent with the fact that unvaccinated people are still going to be at high risk."<

>The message from Walker and her team at Oxford was clear: Vaccination remains the best way to protect against infection, and certainly against serious illness or hospitalization with COVID-19, including the Delta variant.<
 
The number of COVID hospitalizations have dropped since the vaccine was given out to the public. I have also intubated a lot less patients. The spread of COVID must be less. What more data do you need?
We are talking about Delta and transmission. And note what I said about getting vaccinated.
Have railed against two things since the beginning. The messaging coming out of the government has been terribly muddled and inconsistent from the beginning of the pandemic. The inconsistent and muddled messaging does not help with vaccine hesitancy and mistrust of the government, especially among groups who have a history of being harmed by the government. It is not nice or fair to use words like "stupid."

Going to guess that at least half of your intubated patients were overweight and/or had diabetes. And that your hospital probably pushes a breakfast of cornflakes, toast, bagels, orange juice, and serves crackers with soup. Sorry for the whataboutism/pivot, but many people could be doing this a lot better by getting better messaging, causing less distrust, then getting vaccines, and perhaps focusing on metabolic health.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUaMoose and Jm0513
What does the phrase “risk being fired mean”?

Are there carve outs in the order for elite individuals who won’t face termination?
 
Good! I thought this was already mandated for all university staff but if not then good that they are doing it. And I don’t believe in religious exemptions they are BS. The only exemptions should be for a legitimate medical reason such as an allergy.


Of course you're all ok with starting mandatory flu vaccines going forward now too, right? Everybody getting temps taken or scanned walking thru the office doors. Metal detecting too as guns kill people.
Imagine the uproar if Aids testing was required years ago. Shocking how "my body my choice" only works in some circumstances.
I'm boosted..not anti vax .
I am OK with mandatory flu vaccines if it came to that. Many schools and day care centers do require flu vaccines. If a legitimate medical exemptions then fine but otherwise get vaccinated. Vaccines are the single greatest way to prevent the spread of communicable diseases. I’m sure one could apply the my body my choice to all of the Texans who think that that there anti abortion stance is so wonderful. What happened to choice in that situation? Organized religion across the board is a joke and a curse with their BS.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: DennisHajekRC84
Of course you're all ok with starting mandatory flu vaccines going forward now too, right? Everybody getting temps taken or scanned walking thru the office doors. Metal detecting too as guns kill people.
Imagine the uproar if Aids testing was required years ago. Shocking how "my body my choice" only works in some circumstances.
I'm boosted..not anti vax .

Dumb, then dumber.
 
That's why it's expressed as increased risk. You have the right to increase your own risk of serious illness and death. You do not have the right to increase my risk.

What part of that don't you understand?
The math and science parts.

Vaccines aren’t a guarantee. Just as requiring three years each of math and science to graduate high school doesn’t ensure that graduates will be able to understand simple math and science concepts later in life.
 
In before the lock. I don't care if you get the shot or not but I don't want to wear a mask to save your ass anymore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT