and tomorrow in Nashville. At long last, the Enforcement staff has turned the case over to the Committee on Infractions for the punishment phase. UNC's Chancellor and AD, as well as head coaches from FB, MBB, and WBB will be there to answer to the COI.
The NCAA's Enforcement staff, you may recall, had issued its initial Notice of Allegations that was pretty damning to MBB and FB. But, then, subsequently reissued a second NOA that was kinder and gentler, lessening the years of infractions and removing direct references to those two revenue programs. This signaled that a deal had been struck.
But... then the NCAA issued a second ANOA that reinstated direct references to FB and MBB, indicating a different dynamic at work. Seems that the NCAA Enforcement did not much appreciate UNC's backtracking and its response to the first ANOA-- the obstruction, the obfuscation, the arrogance, etc.-- you know, the whole "yes we cheated but academics is our business not yours" thing.
So now the COI gets the case, and all that rich primary evidence including emails, transcripts, etc. The COI can take things well beyond what scope Enforcement laid out for it. Everything's in play with the COI.
Links:
http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/college/acc/unc/article166822887.html
https://www.dukebasketballreport.com/2017/8/14/16142652/barry-jacobs-on-the-unc-scandal
https://pilotonline.com/sports/colu...cle_18fc6af4-f808-53e6-b107-ca46fb2a1e6a.html
http://radio.cbssports.com/2017/07/26/feinstein-ncaa-must-hammer-unc-for-academic-fraud/
http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/college/acc/unc/unc-now/article167344467.html
The NCAA's Enforcement staff, you may recall, had issued its initial Notice of Allegations that was pretty damning to MBB and FB. But, then, subsequently reissued a second NOA that was kinder and gentler, lessening the years of infractions and removing direct references to those two revenue programs. This signaled that a deal had been struck.
But... then the NCAA issued a second ANOA that reinstated direct references to FB and MBB, indicating a different dynamic at work. Seems that the NCAA Enforcement did not much appreciate UNC's backtracking and its response to the first ANOA-- the obstruction, the obfuscation, the arrogance, etc.-- you know, the whole "yes we cheated but academics is our business not yours" thing.
So now the COI gets the case, and all that rich primary evidence including emails, transcripts, etc. The COI can take things well beyond what scope Enforcement laid out for it. Everything's in play with the COI.
Links:
http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/college/acc/unc/article166822887.html
https://www.dukebasketballreport.com/2017/8/14/16142652/barry-jacobs-on-the-unc-scandal
https://pilotonline.com/sports/colu...cle_18fc6af4-f808-53e6-b107-ca46fb2a1e6a.html
http://radio.cbssports.com/2017/07/26/feinstein-ncaa-must-hammer-unc-for-academic-fraud/
http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/college/acc/unc/unc-now/article167344467.html
Last edited: