Very confident staff made right move with Mclung. He struggles to take his hs opponents off the dribble. The d- will be tough. He is a great worker thoug and will find success. Good luck to him.We’ll see...
The staff made what move? He decommited and we haven't replaced him with a PG since. Are you saying the staff cooled on him and let him go? Is that just revisionist history?Very confident staff made right move with Mclung. He struggles to take his hs opponents off the dribble. The d- will be tough. He is a great worker thoug and will find success. Good luck to him.
All I am saying is that I am happy McClung decommited I don’t know anything that happened behind the scenes. I am confident in staff going forward. That’s it.The staff made what move? He decommited and we haven't replaced him with a PG since. Are you saying the staff cooled on him and let him go? Is that just revisionist history?
Exactly. Watch almost any other game and everybody else has better wings than us. Not just talking about the top 25. Somebody has to become an offensive threat for us to move up the ladder.If I had to guess, and it would be a guess, 20-25 minutes. 7-8PPG. The days of getting nothing out of a wing spot offensively have to end.
I'll take that bet. What are your parameters? McClung looks pretty spectacular right now. Barring injury to either, I'm guessing we hear a lot more about McClung (currently on the front page of WaPo) than we do about Kiss. I wish it weren't so, but I think McClung will be a mini-version of Saquon -- the one that got away.Rutgers will not see a sanders type of athlete for another four five years. Kiss will be a better player than Mac McClung in college
I'll take that bet. What are your parameters? McClung looks pretty spectacular right now. Barring injury to either, I'm guessing we hear a lot more about McClung (currently on the front page of WaPo) than we do about Kiss. I wish it weren't so, but I think McClung will be a mini-version of Saquon -- the one that got away.
I think a lot of people are assessing how kiss is going to fit into our team based on how he did at Quinnipiac. While that makes a lot of sense, remember that he will have had a full year under our coaching staff.
And look at what they have done with our other players. So, my point is I think this kid is going to contribute more than a lot of people think.
I'll be very happy if you are right and I am wrong. I just see this kid (McClung) as the ultimate gym rat with a freakish ability to jump. No look passes, tough as nails, etc. As a pg, he isn't likely to have as many rpg as a wing, but let's put apg in there as well. BTW, I don't know what G'town has next year by way of a pg. Will this kid be behind someone?Skillet,
I know you are in NZ. I just don't see McClung performing high at the next level. His HS competition is very mediocre, and they have only played a couple decent teams. Much like Justin Goode who was deadly against weak competition in HS, but it could never translate due to whatever.
Well see what happens. If you come to a game at the RAC, we could place a friendly wager on 16 Handles that Kiss will have a better year next year than McClung when looking at PPG and RPG.
I see this program as going up regardless, much like every one else. There are a lot of good kids out there that I am sure the program will acquire.
I'll be very happy if you are right and I am wrong. I just see this kid (McClung) as the ultimate gym rat with a freakish ability to jump. No look passes, tough as nails, etc. As a pg, he isn't likely to have as many rpg as a wing, but let's put apg in there as well. BTW, I don't know what G'town has next year by way of a pg. Will this kid be behind someone?
I'm all for that. He just seems like one of those kids who becomes an instant fan favorite. But he doesn't necessarily look like a great shooter. In all honesty, neither does Kiss. His practice tape shows him missing quite a few. Also, why practice shooting two pointers just inside the three point arc? Wouldn't that be the shot that has the lowest ROI?Me too! Sounds good. There is likely a chance he is behind someone. It is weird too that McClungs AAU team didn't always have him play PG. They moved him off the ball. I hope he does well. I am just okay with him not coming here. I think RU can find someone else to fit the part a little better.
Not if his fg % was mysteriously 50% higher from there than 3 point land.I'm all for that. He just seems like one of those kids who becomes an instant fan favorite. But he doesn't necessarily look like a great shooter. In all honesty, neither does Kiss. His practice tape shows him missing quite a few. Also, why practice shooting two pointers just inside the three point arc? Wouldn't that be the shot that has the lowest ROI?
I'm all for that. He just seems like one of those kids who becomes an instant fan favorite. But he doesn't necessarily look like a great shooter. In all honesty, neither does Kiss. His practice tape shows him missing quite a few. Also, why practice shooting two pointers just inside the three point arc? Wouldn't that be the shot that has the lowest ROI?
I have a friend who went to Quinipiac. He thought we got a "steal" with Kiss and hated losing him then, after watching us play a lot early in the season, sent a text saying "Kiss is perfect for your your style of play and exactly the kind of shooter you guys need." FWIW.
Kiss plays more than Issa.....take it to the bank. Would be wrong if Issa pulls a Eugene and comes back ready to play minutes at a totally new position.
Time will tell. Thiam progressed from Freshman to Sophomore year, and should again from Sophomore to Junior year. I'd expect he'd continue to work on some of the things we saw added over the course of the year.... post moves, drives from the arc, head fakes for open shots or drives, improved defense.
I don't see anyone playing more than 25 min at the wing, though.
We replace him with Shaq. We definitely traded up here. Also, the timing of the two moves appears that decommit was mutual (don't have any first hand knowledge).The staff made what move? He decommited and we haven't replaced him with a PG since. Are you saying the staff cooled on him and let him go? Is that just revisionist history?
Really? You learn never to say no or none. My daughter was one who an 8th grade teacher told us she had no scholastic aptitude. She is now a 4.0 student in college. Bottom line, everyone can improve if they desire.We agree to disagree here! no offensive improvement.
We agree to disagree here! no offensive improvement.
Kiss plays more than Issa.....take it to the bank. Would be wrong if Issa pulls a Eugene and comes back ready to play minutes at a totally new position.
Check his ORtg from freshman to sophomore year (and while you're at it, his RB%s).
I agree with you that he's not at the level he needs to be right now as a starting wing (especially offensively) - but that doesn't mean he hasn't improved from his freshman year. He could mature into that player as a junior if that trajectory continues.
His biggest issue is mental - he needs more of a "demand the ball" mentality, because there's a good chance he's got a defensive mismatch every time down the court.
Assuming Sanders comes back, I think Kiss will probably be around 8-9th in the rotation and get the 5th most minutes at the guard spot behind Sanders, Baker, Thiam, and Mathis. Probably around 10-12 min per game, and maybe around 5-6 pts and 2-3 rbs... more if Sanders doesn't come back.....
Choppin....My son came home with a D on his test and I wasn't happy. He said, "Dad I got most of the questions I answered right." I asked him why he didn't finish the test he said, "A lot of those questions were hard so I didn't answer them because I didn't want to get them wrong."
If you play solid defense chances are you will see a lot of PT. Unless Kiss is equal to Issa defensively or clearly superior offensively I don't believe for a minute he plays more minutes.Kiss plays more than Issa.....take it to the bank. Would be wrong if Issa pulls a Eugene and comes back ready to play minutes at a totally new position.