Let's see where he is after year 5. He's not a bad coach. It's not a guarantee that a program like RU could replace him with an upgrade -- we've failed to do so multiple times.
Not to open up the argument of my youth, but I like that we gave Gary Waters five years and took stock of things (though it did not appear that Mulcahy really waited until the end of year 5 to make a call). After five years, it was his program and we had seen the good and the bad from him, as well as his second wave of recruits**. If Pike's still toiling in the bottom quarter of the conference and replacing Baker, Mathis, Johnson, etc with less talented guys than those, I'd be comfortable letting him go. If he's trending up, around .500 and reloading with solid recruits, fine with keeping him.
** The FHJ-as-assistant situation muddied this though
Not to open up the argument of my youth, but I like that we gave Gary Waters five years and took stock of things (though it did not appear that Mulcahy really waited until the end of year 5 to make a call). After five years, it was his program and we had seen the good and the bad from him, as well as his second wave of recruits**. If Pike's still toiling in the bottom quarter of the conference and replacing Baker, Mathis, Johnson, etc with less talented guys than those, I'd be comfortable letting him go. If he's trending up, around .500 and reloading with solid recruits, fine with keeping him.
** The FHJ-as-assistant situation muddied this though