And Fassett who was there confirmed that Lewis had no part of the fight.
I'm not defending Lewis was a nice guy but when we get brain dead people saying Lewis "killed 2 guys" they need to be called out.
When first questioned right after the murder in January , Fassett ( who was at the scene ) claimed he seen Lewis fighting.
By the time it went to trial in May Fassett changed his story and the prosecution made a deal with Lewis to drop the Murder charge
and only prosecute him for a far lesser charge obstruction of justice, if he testified against his two friends.
Without Fassett's testimony the Murder case against Lewis was ruined and the chance of proving Ray Lewis was physically involved was nil.
But at first Facett's testimony ,if he stuck with what he first told the police, could have put Lewis in the middle of the murder, without that testimony no one could prove Lewis didn't leave the limo and wasn't involved.
So the question is: was Fassett telling the truth at first, or was scared and made up a lie involving Lewis but told the truth when it came time for him to testify.
As far as I'm concerned it's not as cut and dry as some make it, but there's no proof that my opinion he was involved ,in some way , is valid.
I can be told I'm wrong, but this case has a lot of uncertainty surrounding it, no matter how you look at it.