I know it's not the difference but so many touch fouls.
Damn right I'll support the team and the coach. Sorry if you don't like that. That's what fans do.
how can you adapt when what you do is called a foul and the other team does the exact same thing and there's no foul. It's consistency. Referee crews dictate the game and you just admit that by what you're saying. But without consistency by the officials how is it fair in any way for the teamsit the refs are calling so many, its up to the coaches to instruct the players to adapt to the way the game is getting called. The focus on everything on defense is causing this and its killing the offense as those scoring numbers are dismal today
Not his style.Your negativity is upsetting. Don't watch Rutgers play anymore if it's really that bad. I agree that there needs to be changes made with cvs but don't attack the players. This years team are a group of talented young ladies. Who just need the right coach at this point. This group is a mix of transfers juco freshman and kids who didn't get much playing time last year being asked to play under the infamous cvs. Give them a break and stop bashing the team.
Not his style.
Interesting stats.
2 point FGs RU had 30 points, MINNESOTA 32.
3 point fgs- RU 9 points Minnesota 21.
Free throws- RU 7 points on 9 shots. Minnesota 27 points on 34 shots.
If that isn't the biggest bullshit I've ever seen then RU men will win the B1G tourney.
25 free throw attempts more than us. That's fracking bullshit
I am not anti CVS nor is bac. We are pro Rutgers. How can anyone truly believe that there I a conspiracy with the refs to unfairly call fouls against RU. What would be the motive?I just read they are now 13-12. How do you lose to a team like that by 34 points? My gosh.
Never was a conspiracy. It is in the style of play, and as someone noted above, being unable to adjust.I am not anti CVS nor is bac. We are pro Rutgers. How can anyone truly believe that there I a conspiracy with the refs to unfairly call fouls against RU. What would be the motive?