Same was true for other QBs including Wimsatt.Sheppard was never the starter, so why would you tailor the offense for someone on the bench?
GS said they never threw long in 23 because OL could not hold blocks for long passes.
Wim was better at longer passes but outside of Washington RU had no deep ball threats anyway.
Wim was often stuck throwing to Dremel in flats - he never caught another TD after September 23
A short 6 year WR with 4 TDs vs Dymere Miller and Ian Strong? Not even close and no wonder Drem couldn't start again .
With blocking and WR weaknesses Wim should have been run more
The TV announcers like Millen kept predicting Wim should be running more in games and it never happened.
Guy ate real estate like Secretariat but no - cant violate the Dockers offense - running is too dangerous
Wim had rough 47.8 % but with 20 TDs and 8 INTs
AK only had a 53.9 with 21 total TDs and 7 INTs
We aren't talking an ocean of difference here for the % increase.
AND it must be recalled that in first part of 24 AK had brutal games with % in the 40s for 2 games and 1 in the 30s%.
Only when Kyle went down the the RU passing geniuses mix-up the stale and predictable passing game by using multiple sets and more aggression. Too bad it took an injury to do the obvious (play to win vs not to lose)
Over and over RU shows it wants a machine cog QB - no risks no heroic - just dinker and dunkers. AK would often have to throw a pass 15 yds along LOS to get 5 yds up the field.
I wont even get into the Siamese mesh where QB/RB run to LOS to fool nobody
Nobody with a good, young QB with good offers should pick RU for career