Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tells you exactly what Rutgers has become.
I haven’t read all the back and forth here but as it pertains to the student videos posted early in this thread they are punishable offenses both by Rutgers University and NJ law.
Article P. (Disruption) of the RU Code of Conduct
2. Disrupting or obstructing an academic class or lecture, an administrative or support function, or official university business.
Could also broadly use NJ laws against disturbing the peace
Could also use NJ anti bullying laws which specifically lists bullying as any gesture, verbal or written act reasonably perceived as motivated by ancestry, national origin (amongst other characteristics) on school grounds or school sanctioned events.
So, when protesters at the event in the video shout “there is only one solution, intifada revolution”, it can be reasonably argued that an Israeli who either lived through the 2 violent intifadas or is aware of the history could perceive that as bullying and a viable threat. In the same way that if a group was chanting “lynchings are justified when our way of life is modified” stands to reason that a black person could perceive it as bullying and a threat.
I actually just went back and listened to the clips and the chants literally call for ethnic cleansing “go back to where you came from and Palestine will be ours alone” and “within our lifetime”. A call that puts a timeline for ethnically cleansing a people is bullying, harassment and most definitely threatening, at the least to an Israeli. And the “no birthright here” chant is most definitely targeting Jews so these protestors could and should have faced multiple charges, school code of conduct violations and none of this is covered by the first amendment based on the laws and conduct codes above.