Some other great pictures:
http://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/i..._wrestling_win_over_m.html#incart_river_index
Last edited:
I was wondering that myself. I would also appreciate any insight.From the stands it almost looked like M. Van Brill let his opponent up to neutral so he could take him down, but there was not that much time left. Does anyone have insight on the last few seconds of that match?
Do you think he might have lost track of the time remaining or the score? There was not much time left to make riding him out that difficult. If those two were to wrestle again I would bet heavily on our guy, despite the preseason rankings.Prob figured he couldn’t ride him out. Let him up to try to get a takedown to win.
Do you think he might have lost track of the time remaining or the score? There was not much time left to make riding him out that difficult. If those two were to wrestle again I would bet heavily on our guy, despite the preseason rankings.
IMO M Vanbrill made the right call to cut him I feel he was going to get another TD but the kid did a nice job to tie him up on the edge and waste time.
It's another example of poor match management by Goodale and staff. I agree cutting him was the right move, but why wait 19 seconds to do it? He should have cut him immediately after the takedown. It was the correct stategy - just too much time wasted.
And once again Matter you are incorrect. Van Brill got the takedown and Deihl was flat on his stomach with Van Brill working his two on one tilt. As soon as Deihl broke the grip and got to his base Van Brill looked to the corner and was told to cut him.
I know that I am not the knowledgeable one here. But it seems to me that our guy looked stronger at that point. My guess would have been that he had a better chance to successfully ride out 34 seconds and get to overtime then to cut the guy loose with 34 seconds and get a take down.And I disagree. With that amount of time remaining, you cut immediately. You don't have the time to see if you can tilt the guy. Otherwise you wind up wasting precious time and losing. Which is what happened. It's different if you are down too far and can't play the takedown game and need backpoints to get the lead. But in this circumstance, you let him out immediately.
And I disagree. With that amount of time remaining, you cut immediately. You don't have the time to see if you can tilt the guy. Otherwise you wind up wasting precious time and losing. Which is what happened. It's different if you are down too far and can't play the takedown game and need backpoints to get the lead. But in this circumstance, you let him out immediately.
I was sitting pretty close to the mat, the staff was yelling to Van Brill to cut his opponent a good 20 seconds before he actually did, but because he was on the opposite side of the mat from where our staff was standing, Van Brill could not hear them at first. Finally one of the coaches, left the coaching area to get closer (probably illegal) and got Van brills attention to cut him, but by then there was very little time left.
I know that I am not the knowledgeable one here. But it seems to me that our guy looked stronger at that point. My guess would have been that he had a better chance to successfully ride out 34 seconds and get to overtime then to cut the guy loose with 34 seconds and get a take down.