Not surprised there is no mention here because most fans think a teams record is the only measure of the teams coach, which it is not. If someone has played at least high school basketball or coached on the high school or college levels they can see the difference between the way Pikes and Holloways teams execute almost everything, certainly from a fundamental and accountability standpoint. Holloway would have done much more with Rutger's talent than Pike has done. Pike has two lottery picks and Holloway has almost nothing. Pike would have difficulty shining Holloway's shoes. Plus, with no talent they almost beat us.