Steelers TD - that call s/b overturned

[GSGS]

Anyone watching the Bengals - Steelers? What Simms and the other announcer are missing is that the Pitt WR only had one foot in bounds after he gained control of the ball (me thinks).

 

[GSGS]

I'm surprised, I think that the ball moved and he didn't have control.

 

[rockyrutgers]

I thought it was a catch too

 

[SkilletHead2]

Anyone watching the Bengals - Steelers? What Simms and the other announcer are missing is that the Pitt WR only had one foot in bounds after he gained control of the ball (me thinks).

Couldn't agree more. The angle from the sideline shows that he lost control of the ball, it hit his leg and then he got the control back. But did not have two feet in bounds while controlling the ball.

 

[St_Henry_Buckeye]

Catch was good. He never lost control of the ball. Simply an amazing catch.

 

[RUsSKii]

That was a catch (an incredible one at that). There was a catch earlier on where the receiver only for one foot in bounds before controlling the ball. Both calls were correct IMO.

 

[nirrad]

As long as it is controlled on your body, and the ball is not moving, it's a catch. TD!