bac2therac Legend Gold Member Jul 30, 2001 227,086 153,022 113 55 Belle Mead NJ Dec 4, 2015 #1 Seton Hall 76 RUTGERS 62 in front of an actual crowd of 6,058
ColonelRutgers All American Gold Member Dec 15, 2003 7,055 9,187 113 Dec 4, 2015 #3 SHU 81 RU 60 Actual fannies in seats: 5,093
M mal359 All Conference Nov 22, 2013 4,544 1,227 113 Dec 4, 2015 #4 Rutgers 118 Seton Hall 1 Reactions: Sir ScarletKnight
G Greene Rice FIG Hall of Famer Dec 30, 2005 38,184 21,291 113 Dec 4, 2015 #5 RU 76 SHU 65 Everything clicks. Reactions: RU at the shore
R RUJMM78 Hall of Famer Gold Member Jul 26, 2001 24,865 10,813 113 Dec 4, 2015 #7 Without Freemen Rutgers simply lacks enough scoring threads. Seton Hall 73 - Rutgers 60 Attendance 5683
Without Freemen Rutgers simply lacks enough scoring threads. Seton Hall 73 - Rutgers 60 Attendance 5683
F FELONIOUSMONK Heisman Winner Apr 1, 2012 11,909 5,017 113 Dec 4, 2015 #8 Seton Hall by a bunch with a virtual crowd of 5000
R RU at the shore All Conference Dec 31, 2005 4,643 1,412 113 Dec 5, 2015 #10 I just don't like how the winds are blowing here right now : Shoe 76 Rut 54
G Greene Rice FIG Hall of Famer Dec 30, 2005 38,184 21,291 113 Dec 5, 2015 #12 SHU is -5.5 in LV. Spread similar to WF
R RutgersJoe Senior Mar 9, 2012 1,070 96 48 Dec 5, 2015 #13 Throw out the stats for this one. I say 69-67 good guys.
Proud NJ Sports Fan Legend May 11, 2010 69,322 50,717 113 Florida Panhandle Dec 5, 2015 #14 RU 66 Hall 63
PatrickRU92 Hall of Famer Gold Member Aug 1, 2001 41,780 15,128 113 Los Angeles, CA Dec 5, 2015 #15 we can't score much WITH Freeman. Unfortunately SHOE can score RU 90 SHOE 18
Caliknight Legend Gold Member Sep 21, 2001 186,757 132,375 113 Dec 5, 2015 #16 I know nothing about Shoe, nor do I want to. I know we are a poor team though. RU 52 Shoe 68
