If the shooters you suggest are consistent, then I would have to say NCAA tournament. There is such a slight difference between six point losses and six point wins. If we had two more quality shooters we would now be 16-6 or 15-7. That's how close we would be with two quality additional shooters.I don’t know the game as much as the rest of you but what would/could we be if my thread title happens?
I’m gonna go with you would have 7 guys on the court and get a T.
Last nights game had to set college hoops back a few years. Both teams looked to be attending a brick laying convention.
That is called strong defense, huskeralways. Defense.
Sa was brought in by Pike. Doorsen had a decent game. Would be nice to see him return and have a solid senior year.We saw improvement from Thiam and Omoruyi, while Sanders, Freeman, Williams, and Sa either stayed the same or took a step back this season. Optimistically, we saw improvement from the players that Pikiell and this staff recruited while the upperclassmen spun their wheels. Hopefully that keeps up and Omoruyi/Thiam continue to develop and Baker, Doucoure, Johnson, and Kiss follow the same kind of path.
Sa was brought in by Pike. Doorsen had a decent game. Would be nice to see him return and have a solid senior year.
For some teams 3 pointers are easier than layups.Sadly,some other teams have great difficulty making any type of shot.We need a reliable guy that can make 1 footers.