From link ("Uber haters should take a lesson from the early days of Amazon"):
Amazon’s two-decade ascent from Internet curiosity to global juggernaut demonstrates an important lesson that foes of Uber would be wise to heed in today’s breakneck digital economy: To fight such disruptive adversaries, hire scientists and engineers, not lawyers and lobbyists. Companies must counter-innovate, not hide behind laws written for an era that has faded into distant memory.
But while the old-timers spend precious time and money on arcane issues like insurance and taxes, firms like Uber and Amazon only get bigger and better.
I don't agree with the premise of that article. Initially Amazon did have a price advantage over brick & mortar stores because it did not have to collect sales tax. But that advantage amounted to approximately 6 to 8 percent, and the that price advantage was offset by shipping fees (Amazon didn't launch Prime free shipping until 2005, and customers have to pay for Prime anyway). Today Amazon is required to collect sales tax in 25 states (and another 5 states don't have sales tax). That represents more than 80% of the nation's population. The real advantage of Amazon is selection ... and that was always the advantage marketed by Amazon (even their logo indicates they have everything from A to Z).
Likewise, I don't understand why Uber fights the insurance regulations. Just like Amazon eventually started collecting sales tax, eventually Uber drivers will have to have adequate insurance or face incredible liability. Uber is threatening to leave NJ if they are required to provide adequate insurance for drivers.
Uber has two parts to their business: The app which makes it easy to reserve and pay for a ride, and the actual ride service. The ride service is inherently no different than any other ride service. They don't have magical cars and they don't have magical drivers. What they do have is a unique app that makes it easy to connect riders and available rides.