It was nice for the first time in a few years to be able to see the numbers and names on the uniforms and knowing who was on the field.
We look like a BigTen team.
We look like a BigTen team.
plain, boring, crappy... looks like children's clothes at walmart on a discount day
Don't care much about uniforms - do care about being able to see the numbers - so I guess I like the new uniforms, lol...It was nice for the first time in a few years to be able to see the numbers and names on the uniforms and knowing who was on the field.
We look like a BigTen team.
No one in my section is thrilled with the unis . Very underwhelming but you can the numbers. Couldn't we have made the numbers visible and yet still had a good looking uni ?plain, boring, crappy... looks like children's clothes at walmart on a discount day
It could match the Arena League like noise pollution from the PA.I'd rather look like a plain boring Big Ten team than the snazziest Arena Football League team.
Our helmets are freaking ugly.... the black and white can stay but the red with the block R has got to go.It was nice for the first time in a few years to be able to see the numbers and names on the uniforms and knowing who was on the field.
We look like a BigTen team.
I love them! But my personal taste in old school looking uniforms with some modern touches, which is just what they are.
The last uniforms went to far in the modern direction for my taste.
Maybe a tweak or two to a couple of the numbers. But they look like Rutgers now, now Western Kentucky or Fresno State.
Yup - don't like them. Something is missing can't put my finger on it - maybe the numbers are too big or the font.
Agree with the bolded.I don't like the font of the numbers but love that I could read them on TV. Color scheme was fine with me.
I love them! But my personal taste in old school looking uniforms with some modern touches, which is just what they are.
The last uniforms went to far in the modern direction for my taste.
Obviously whether one likes the new uniforms is a matter of personal taste with no right or wrong answer. A more objective question is whether the new uniforms have achieved the objective which Ash had previously stated - a more traditional look, yet distinctively Rutgers. My opinion on that is a strong yes.
Plus, you can see the numbers!
The color is a huge improvement. That's about it.
I think they need the numbers on the shoulders to spice it up a bit.Yup - don't like them. Something is missing can't put my finger on it - maybe the numbers are too big or the font.
Shhh...stop making sense, it won't be well received.I was in Scarlet Fever a couple of weeks ago. They had an old jersey and a new jersey side by side. The color is EXACTLY the same. I was surprised myself. The numbers and the battle scars are creating a color illusion.
+1I'd rather look like a plain boring Big Ten team than the snazziest Arena Football League team.
It's not a checkerboard pattern.Think the issue is the shoulder/sleeve area - I'd get rid of this checkerboard pattern on the sleeve and white stripe on the shoulder and replace them with either TV numbers on the shoulders with 2 horizontal white stripes on the sleeve or TV numbers on the shoulder and a white border on the edge of the sleeve.
But get rid of the checkerboard pattern on the sleeve.
imo
![]()
If only we can play like one.
![]()
old F**t favorites.plain, boring, crappy... looks like children's clothes at walmart on a discount day
Blasphemy!Our helmets are freaking ugly.... the black and white can stay but the red with the block R has got to go.
As most on the site would say, "I'm glad those kids got off my lawn."[roll]It was nice for the first time in a few years to be able to see the numbers and names on the uniforms and knowing who was on the field.
We look like a BigTen team.