ADVERTISEMENT

What if the loss turns out to be….

NealPageNJ

All Conference
Gold Member
Nov 28, 2019
4,903
6,914
113
Somehow a good thing?

Going into the Minnesota game, most brackets had RU at 8 or 9. 1 round from playing the one seed. Today, I’m seeing 11/12/13. What if when the dust settles, and the committee is favorable, RU is seeded 12-14? Probably sets up a bit better.

This, of course, depends on an improvement in play.
 
You aren't seeing 12 and 13

Ru is seeded 9, 10, 11 and yes the latter two are better if its not first four play in games
 
I might be wrong but I don’t think P5 schools can be 12-16 seeds now?

Either way, getting out of 8/9 and still making it would be fine by me.
 
I might be wrong but I don’t think P5 schools can be 12-16 seeds now?

Either way, getting out of 8/9 and still making it would be fine by me.
Interesting, is this an actual rule of bracket making or more of an unwritten rule?
 
You aren't seeing 12 and 13

Ru is seeded 9, 10, 11 and yes the latter two are better if its not first four play in games
I’m seeing 11 in most today. Solid play against NW and a B1G win should help. Of course, those things have to happen.
 
Interesting, is this an actual rule of bracket making or more of an unwritten rule?
It's simply a function of how it all works. If there was a season where all of the smaller conference tourney champs were better than the bubble teams, then it bumps the play-in games on the bubble down to 16 seeds...but it's never going to happen.
 
Somehow a good thing?

Going into the Minnesota game, most brackets had RU at 8 or 9. 1 round from playing the one seed. Today, I’m seeing 11/12/13. What if when the dust settles, and the committee is favorable, RU is seeded 12-14? Probably sets up a bit better.

This, of course, depends on an improvement in play.
Was thinking similarly if it results in making us mentally tougher and more focused. Our players are likely more resilient than most of us on these boards. And if that occurs and we can win a first round NCAA game vs. a 6 or 7 seed, we’d have a better chance in a second round game vs. a 2 or 3 seed. Have to look at the potential positive side.
 
Somehow a good thing?

Going into the Minnesota game, most brackets had RU at 8 or 9. 1 round from playing the one seed. Today, I’m seeing 11/12/13. What if when the dust settles, and the committee is favorable, RU is seeded 12-14? Probably sets up a bit better.

This, of course, depends on an improvement in play.
No nothing good will come from that disaster last night.
 
I might be wrong but I don’t think P5 schools can be 12-16 seeds now?

Either way, getting out of 8/9 and still making it would be fine by me.

They can be 12s if it works out that way as play ins. But at larges are pretty much always 12s and under. If a school like Nebraska won the Big 10 tourney they would be more like a 13.
 
I might be wrong but I don’t think P5 schools can be 12-16 seeds now?

Either way, getting out of 8/9 and still making it would be fine by me.
You might be able to get a 12 with no bid stealers but pretty unlikely. There’s no way an at large is ever getting 13+
 
  • Like
Reactions: GORU2014
I don't know where some are seeing we're seeded 11, 12, etc. Most top bracketologists still see us as a 9 seed. And I'm talking about those more skilled than Lunardi and the wet noodle Jerry Palm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletDave
Seeding Can Help. I Am Not Opposed And Simply Hope Play Ins Keep It Easier. Let's Look Just Over Recent Developments Accepting New Scenarios. Thusly Rutgers Is Now Getting Easier Roads
 
If Minnesota won the Big Ten tournament, are they a 16 seed? Or would they be higher up
 
I'd go with 13, as they'd pick up some really good wins along the way...although if Louisville won the ACC, I'd go with 14.

And both Minny and Louisville would have a 1st round bye while Rutgers would potentially be a higher seed and have to play an extra game (play in game).
Who cares about a resume. Win a couple games in March and 1st round bye.

Such a terrible logistical tournament.
 
And both Minny and Louisville would have a 1st round bye while Rutgers would potentially be a higher seed and have to play an extra game (play in game).
Who cares about a resume. Win a couple games in March and 1st round bye.

Such a terrible logistical tournament.
It's the beauty of it to me...it's why heading into March, almost every school in the country still has dreams of winning the NCAA tournament. I wish that we'd get rid of the play-in games completely, go back to 64, and everyone starts on Thursday/Friday.
 
I still can’t believe we actually hit the point of the season where thinking a loss to Minnesota might be a good thing. Total disbelief right now.
No, a loss in a game that would have secured our bid to the NCAA’s is NOT A GOOD THING
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT