ADVERTISEMENT

Why the lack of Russo love?

Sep 14, 2007
719
260
63
This kid was a total steal when he committed and even after being publicly blasted by dozens of RU fans on commitment day, stayed the course and went on to have a monster summer and season this year. He stuck with us through all of the early season BS as well as watching our fans rip our starting QB apart (trust me no recruit is into this, no matter how you spin it). Now I see posts about he won't fit our offense and how we prefer other kids? Since when did a winning QB with an accurate and powerful arm not fit an offense? I must have missed the hundreds of Mariota's and Cam Newton all over the football landscape these days. As far as I can tell, this kid has been a complete class act and I'd be proud as hell to see him end up here.

So what am I missing? How on earth could we not be begging this kid to come here?
 
Most love what Russo brings. There are a few squeaky wheels who fell for hype over accomplishment.
 
Other than a few knuckleheads, we'd still love to have him.

Edit: If the latest post is true, he may not feel the same way. Oh well.
 
Seems like a great kid and a very good player. Just not sure if he is a fit for what we want to do offensively.
 
Very few posters "publicly blasted" Russo before or after his commitment.

In fact, the consensus was that as a Pro Set QB he was well ahead of Guarantano as a fit, and only a little behind Haskins ... the other 2 QB RU was pursuing.

Also, VERY few, if any, posters were actually wanting Russo to decommit after Ash was hired. The vast majority wanted him to stay committed.

Many DID speculate he might well decommit, however ... not the same as WANTING him to decommit. Russo had been very upfront during his initial recruitment that he was looking for a Pro Set offense (though how Temple fits into that I have no idea), and it became clear very fast that Ash would not run a Pro Set offense, and nor does the new OC run a Pro Set offense.

Almost no one on this Board would not like Russo to stick ... but he was wavering after Flood was fired, and just had a conversation with one of Ash's new assistants, so he must not have heard what he wanted to hear about the direction of the offense.

Our begging on a message board for a commit to stay committed means nothing. We have no idea what the new head coach's plan is for QB, or what the dialogue with Russo entailed. This looks like a bummer now, but it could work out better for both Russo and RU at some point. And maybe Russo ends up back in the fold - we do not know.

Mainly, most posters felt Russo would feel there was not a great fit more than RU could not find a fit for HIM. And, as I said earlier in this post, we have no idea what was said between Russo and the new RU assistant coach. Maybe RU wanted to keep him, but Russo has decided it is not the fit he wants. Maybe it was mutual, because the RU staff has other ideas about QB's. WE DO NOT KNOW.

A new head coach, however, should get the benefit of the doubt, at least for a time, from the fans, that the direction he is going is the best one for the program, and no ONE recruit is more important than the new direction the program is heading (and hopefully a more winning direction).
 
Will he go to Pitt, Temple or Pen St?
WHY do i hope none of the above....UConn or Temple seem like decent fits except it makes us look bad as though we made another PR snafu or some such crazy spin...I hope whatever it is AR's happy as he had deep love for us...bad time for HCCA to be looking to bowl....I guess GS is house hunting as usual in the Columbus area..
 
Love Russo, just thunk he is better served in a different type of O
Love Russo as well.

The major concerns people have is that we have been subjected to a failed version of the pro-style offense. So, many fans want either much better pro-style play that is not stagnant. Or what fans (and offensive recruits) want is an exciting type if offense that can put up points consistently.

The other concern is that if we move to an offense where the QB is expected to be able to run for positive yards and is a weapon in that way, then the question is if Russo is able to do that with his feet on a consistent basis against tough B1G defenses
 
WHY do i hope none of the above....UConn or Temple seem like decent fits except it makes us look bad as though we made another PR snafu or some such crazy spin...I hope whatever it is AR's happy as he had deep love for us...bad time for HCCA to be looking to bowl....I guess GS is house hunting as usual in the Columbus area..

How is this a PR snafu or negative in any way, regardless of who he signs with? We have a different coaching staff that will bring in a different offensive system compared to what we previously played, and if it's been determined, by either party or both parties, that Russo's strengths are not best suited for this system, I don't see the big deal.

I'm sure the kid will kill it wherever he ends up signing and with the right system for his talent, and we'll recruit the right QB for the new system that will be implemented. Both parties will be fine and any negative news is simply nonsense.
 
How is this a PR snafu or negative in any way, regardless of who he signs with? We have a different coaching staff that will bring in a different offensive system compared to what we previously played, and if it's been determined, by either party or both parties, that Russo's strengths are not best suited for this system, I don't see the big deal.

I'm sure the kid will kill it wherever he ends up signing and with the right system for his talent, and we'll recruit the right QB for the new system that will be implemented. Both parties will be fine and any negative news is simply nonsense.
I don't think its that...read what i said with all the negativity swirling around every move we make some dimwit will claim we LOST HIM....everyone ain't as knowledgable as we are on the board....ask Politi...
 
Who doesn't love Russo???

Same idiots who 99% of the fan base does. The 1% always exist, every school has them.
 
I think he lost a few on this board when he posted a pic of himself with the Temple OC. Doesn't exactly come off as a very loyal move. However, I am in the camp of giving the kid a break, there is nothing wrong with stockpiling talent at the QB position even if he doesn't fit the new offensive scheme perfectly.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT