...has serious pkaymaking athletes all over the field. Fleck has recruited perfectly for what he wanted to do there.
Last edited:
It's all those top recruiting classes they've had.......has serious pkaymaking athletes all over the field.
That's the offense that exact OC wanted to do here. We fired him.So that's what the offense RU is trying to run looks like when it works.
It's all those top recruiting classes they've had....
Props to you for being able to listen to Beth Mowins. Had to shut it off. Good summary of what Fleck accomplished in the link below, including his offensive scheme:A lot of talk on the broadcast about how Fleck has developed WMU into a winner. Main points--over the course of several years, he has: (1) developed/established the culture; (2) developed his own head coaching style based on different bits from other coaches he's worked for (including GS); and (3) recruited locally (only 14 players on the roster from outside the Great Lakes area; most of the roster is from Michigan).
In other words, ALL the things that Ash is trying to do here, among others. Now, that's no guarantee Ash will be successful, but he is going about this the right way. Still, it is going to take time. Fleck was 1-11 his first year. Look at him now.
We are in good hands and I think the future is very bright.
But not highly ranked classes nationally. People complain we have no talent & claim that's the biggest excuse for losing or not playing well, yet we've had better classes than WMU every year except 2016...They've had very good MAC classes. The best.
If people arent catching onto what vkj is implying, we ran cirocca outta town after 1 year because we thought he was a terrible OC, now people on this same board are complementing him. In other words dont jump the gun on mehringer, give the guy some timeThat's the offense that exact OC wanted to do here. We fired him.
Ummmmm theyre playing MAC teams and although theyve beaten 2 B1G teams this year, WMU is loaded with upper classmen that Fleck recruited specifically for his teamBut not highly ranked classes nationally. People complain we have no talent & claim that's the biggest excuse for losing or not playing well, yet we've had better classes than WMU every year except 2016...
2012 #47, 2.15* (Rutgers #25, 3.26*)
2013 NR in top 100, 2* (Rutgers #44, 2.82*)
2014 #62, 2.5* (Rutgers #58, 2.5*)
2015 #78, 2.22* (Rutgers #54, 2.6*)
2016 #64, 2.33* (Rutgers #78, 2.44*)
It's all those top recruiting classes they've had....
But not highly ranked classes nationally. People complain we have no talent & claim that's the biggest excuse for losing or not playing well, yet we've had better classes than WMU every year except 2016...
2012 #47, 2.15* (Rutgers #25, 3.26*)
2013 NR in top 100, 2* (Rutgers #44, 2.82*)
2014 #62, 2.5* (Rutgers #58, 2.5*)
2015 #78, 2.22* (Rutgers #54, 2.6*)
2016 #64, 2.33* (Rutgers #78, 2.44*)
But not highly ranked classes nationally. People complain we have no talent & claim that's the biggest excuse for losing or not playing well, yet we've had better classes than WMU every year except 2016...
2012 #47, 2.15* (Rutgers #25, 3.26*)
2013 NR in top 100, 2* (Rutgers #44, 2.82*)
2014 #62, 2.5* (Rutgers #58, 2.5*)
2015 #78, 2.22* (Rutgers #54, 2.6*)
2016 #64, 2.33* (Rutgers #78, 2.44*)
If WMU played a B1G schedule they'd get crushed and be a 500 teamBut not highly ranked classes nationally. People complain we have no talent & claim that's the biggest excuse for losing or not playing well, yet we've had better classes than WMU every year except 2016...
2012 #47, 2.15* (Rutgers #25, 3.26*)
2013 NR in top 100, 2* (Rutgers #44, 2.82*)
2014 #62, 2.5* (Rutgers #58, 2.5*)
2015 #78, 2.22* (Rutgers #54, 2.6*)
2016 #64, 2.33* (Rutgers #78, 2.44*)
Yes but they don't play in the B1G conference. They play in the MAC it's not the same week in week out grind. Their toughest opponents to date are probably Northwestern and Illinois. Not exactly the cream of the crop in the B1G. Plus they're in year 3 of implementing their new offense. We're in year 1 and they completely sucked offensively their 1st two years.But not highly ranked classes nationally. People complain we have no talent & claim that's the biggest excuse for losing or not playing well, yet we've had better classes than WMU every year except 2016...
2012 #47, 2.15* (Rutgers #25, 3.26*)
2013 NR in top 100, 2* (Rutgers #44, 2.82*)
2014 #62, 2.5* (Rutgers #58, 2.5*)
2015 #78, 2.22* (Rutgers #54, 2.6*)
2016 #64, 2.33* (Rutgers #78, 2.44*)
Uh, yeah no. Rutgers wouldn't be DFL, but in the bottom half the MAC. We'd have the best talent in the conference, but...Our team would be competitive in the MAC.
But our team plays in the B1G. we don't have much B1G level talent.
Exactly, I said this in some other threads, we tried this in 2010 with Captain Kirk WMU's OC and it was a complete failure. Schiano had the right idea, but neither he nor the fan base had the stomach to go through the pains required to change an offense. It was only a failure because we didn't give it enough time to succeed. We are now witnessing history repeating itself with the same fan base.That's the offense that exact OC wanted to do here. We fired him.
I don't know about that. I wouldn't consider the MAC any better of a conference then the WAC. However, that is up for debate . New Mexico who we beat currently sits in around 5th place at 7-4 in a 12 team conference. I think if we played a MAC or WAC conference schedule we'd be near the top. Remember it's the weekly grind and depth that eventually kills you in the B1G.Uh, yeah no. Rutgers wouldn't be DFL, but in the bottom half the MAC. We'd have the best talent in the conference, but...
Stuff happens. You just have to accept it. Janarion Grant was playing. His absence was felt the rest of the season when we didn't have him. When UNM played us, their star offensive player and star defensive player was out. Part way through our game, Apodaca, their more experienced QB got crushed with a clavicle injury. My opinion - which of course means squat - if we played a few weeks later, we would've lost.I don't know about that. I wouldn't consider the MAC any better of a conference then the WAC. However, that is up for debate . New Mexico who we beat currently sits in around 5th place at 7-4 in a 12 team conference. I think if we played a MAC or WAC conference schedule we'd be near the top. Remember it's the weekly grind and depth that eventually kills you in the B1G.
Uh, yeah no. Rutgers wouldn't be DFL, but in the bottom half the MAC. We'd have the best talent in the conference, but...
And u wouldn't take that this year, .500 football.If WMU played a B1G schedule they'd get crushed and be a 500 team
But not highly ranked classes nationally. People complain we have no talent & claim that's the biggest excuse for losing or not playing well, yet we've had better classes than WMU every year except 2016...
2012 #47, 2.15* (Rutgers #25, 3.26*)
2013 NR in top 100, 2* (Rutgers #44, 2.82*)
2014 #62, 2.5* (Rutgers #58, 2.5*)
2015 #78, 2.22* (Rutgers #54, 2.6*)
2016 #64, 2.33* (Rutgers #78, 2.44*)
WMU beat Northwestern by 1 & blew out Illinois 34-10 @ Illinois, yet we got blown out by Illinois. I guess PJ has a smaller dog house or really coaches up those lesser recruits.
Um, no. I'm debunking the myth that it's just terrible talent. Coaches win with less talent than we have.Well, if you're trying to compare vs. Ash. Check Fleck's first year and get back to me. Bye.
Um, no. I'm debunking the myth that it's just terrible talent. Coaches win with less talent than we have.
We may had better classes but how many players are still here? Look at the top 10 from each class. It's ugly, Barnwell, Ayers, Nelson, Gopre, Ford, etc. all top recruits. Take away those players and I bet WMU has more star talent and much more actual talent.But not highly ranked classes nationally. People complain we have no talent & claim that's the biggest excuse for losing or not playing well, yet we've had better classes than WMU every year except 2016...
2012 #47, 2.15* (Rutgers #25, 3.26*)
2013 NR in top 100, 2* (Rutgers #44, 2.82*)
2014 #62, 2.5* (Rutgers #58, 2.5*)
2015 #78, 2.22* (Rutgers #54, 2.6*)
2016 #64, 2.33* (Rutgers #78, 2.44*)
No clue what DFL means,.
I don't think they lose as badly as we did though.They would get demolished if they played OSU, Nebraska, Wisky etc.
Just pointing out facts. All teams from BE that left for bigger conferences got a dose of reality when every game every week was a battle WMU would get beaten down and get smoked We do not have B1G depth but are working on it. You guys need to look past the prize and look at what it takes to get that prize....we are not there yet. In 2-3 yrs we will have the depth with good recruiting to have the opportunity to get that prizeAnd u wouldn't take that this year, .500 football.
Absolutely they do.I don't think they lose as badly as we did though.
I respect your opinion but they would get smashedI don think so.
I agree they lose but not by the margins we were giving up.I respect your opinion but they would get smashed
Maybe not 78-0 but the lose easily to Mich and Ohio State by 30I agree they lose but not by the margins we were giving up.
Maybe not 78-0 but the lose easily to Mich and Ohio State by 30