ADVERTISEMENT

WrestleStat Rankings for 2/2/2016

andegre

Sophomore
May 18, 2004
377
160
43
Finally got the rankings finished up late last night after the outage that occurred yesterday. Anyway...

In the wrestler rankings, not much changes except Zain Retherford moves into the #1 spot at 149 after another dominating performance over a top 10 opponent.

Wrestler Rankings: http://www.wrestlestats.com/rankings/all

Not many changes in the team rankings this week, those top 3 look awfully close. Looking at these team rankings, it's becoming more-and-more apparent that they are skewed toward dual scoring instead of tournament scoring. In the next few weeks, I'll work on implementing a tournament scoring model to give a better idea now that we are getting closer to conference tournaments, and the national tournament.

Team Rankings: http://www.wrestlestats.com/rankings/team

By the way, I made a pretty good change last night that I, and others feel is long overdue. You can now change ALL of the starters for a team at the same time. From either the roster, depth chart, elgibility breakdown, or schedule pages for a team, there is a link on the left for "Update Starters". There, you can select the starter at each weight and save in one shot.

Let me know your thoughts on this change, and any other future enhancement you'd like to see in the site.

Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: obrats
How can Cornell be ranked ahead of us when we spanked them?
The points they get/got for their #1 and #2 ranked wrestlers have a big influence on the team rankings. Rutgers is should solid up and down, whereas Cornell has "studs", with some ho-hum wrestlers to fill in the other weights.
 
The points they get/got for their #1 and #2 ranked wrestlers have a big influence on the team rankings. Rutgers is should solid up and down, whereas Cornell has "studs", with some ho-hum wrestlers to fill in the other weights.
Ya kinda of didn't answer Bill's question.Why would a team that we beat, be ranked above ours? Cornell has 3 studs and the rest are mediocre,I get it,but we have outscored them all year.There are plenty of teams with "studs" that aren't even ranked.
 
If you've got one or two guys that probably will win a national championship, plus others competing in the national tournament, your team score and therefore ranking could definitely be higher than a solid TEAM.

Since Andre and Havek have explained this, I'm not quite sure what the confusion is.

If it's a team dual meet ranking, then that would be different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andegre
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT