RU_DIO Heisman Winner Gold Member Sep 1, 2002 15,300 14,400 113 Jersey Shore Oct 24, 2015 #1 He was short. How the hell did they give them a first down? Reactions: rutgers48 and KaKaKen
Blitz8RUCrazy Heisman Winner Jan 24, 2012 11,594 4,078 113 Oct 24, 2015 #2 who cares. It wouldn't have mattered.
RUfromSoCal? Hall of Famer Gold Member Nov 27, 2006 32,912 39,320 113 Oct 24, 2015 #4 would it have mattered? probably not........ but bad spot.
Caliknight Legend Gold Member Sep 21, 2001 189,820 137,811 113 Oct 24, 2015 #5 Awful job by the refs. Herbie and Folwer couldn't believe it either.
cubuffsdoug Heisman Winner Apr 8, 2002 14,690 24,598 113 Oct 24, 2015 #7 RUfromSoCal? said: would it have mattered? probably not........ but bad spot. Click to expand... Maybe it's 3 pts instead of 7. If Rutgers was to mount a comeback it could be the difference in the game. Just wishful thinking.
RUfromSoCal? said: would it have mattered? probably not........ but bad spot. Click to expand... Maybe it's 3 pts instead of 7. If Rutgers was to mount a comeback it could be the difference in the game. Just wishful thinking.
DHajekRC84 Hall of Famer Gold Member Aug 9, 2001 29,999 19,117 113 Oct 24, 2015 #8 the way Rutgers was playing D right there I say they would have tried for 3... but they were given 7 so we'll never know. We got screwed at home again..
the way Rutgers was playing D right there I say they would have tried for 3... but they were given 7 so we'll never know. We got screwed at home again..
rutgers4life11 All Conference Jan 22, 2014 2,951 2,409 113 Oct 24, 2015 #9 we're here complaining about calls by the refs instead of play calls by our coach... one is the reason we're down by 28
we're here complaining about calls by the refs instead of play calls by our coach... one is the reason we're down by 28
RUinOhio All American Gold Member Dec 4, 2006 6,419 4,109 113 Ohio Oct 24, 2015 #10 In their defense they were complaining when the game was zeroes Reactions: rutgers48