Well Rutgers was playing #4 Michigan State in the Big Ten...who the F cares who BC was playing. Do you really have a problem comprehending the difference?But BC's 4th down spike in the final seconds did not. Hmm....
Well Rutgers was playing #4 Michigan State in the Big Ten...who the F cares who BC was playing. Do you really have a problem comprehending the difference?
I just dont understand RU fans so upset about it. It wasn't like RU was on the 5 yard line.The difference as you describe it does not matter to me. BC committed a desperate, impulsive, yet still stupid spike when they had a chance to score and maybe a better chance to score.
This may have been the first time that happened in CFB or NFL, where TWO teams commit dumb game-ending spikes in the same hour of the same day. They both deserve near equal infamy in the media.
If it happened against UCONN nobody would pay attention but it was against a team that is in the mix for the playoffs. I don't understand this boards uproarOf course it's going to make the funny moment stuff. In the bigger picture , it was pretty meaningless...the clock was running ...would have been tough to even get the ball snapped and people down toward the goal line in my opinion. Much ado about nothing. MSU completed some really tough pass plays on key downs on that last drive..that's where the game was lost for RU.
Actually with Carroo, we had a reasonable chance!I just dont understand RU fans so upset about it. It wasn't like RU was on the 5 yard line.
Actually with Carroo, we had a reasonable chance!
Yeah, but we would've brought in Rettig, lol...I assume you're joking.
Laviano would have had to throw a fairly accurate pass of 55-60 yards counting how far he'd drop back.
You'd have to assume the OL would have given him the time to wait for the WR's to get downfield.
2 WR's would have to beat 4 or more DBs for the ball.
I wouldn't call anything about that "reasonable".
The play I envision, if he doesn't spike it, is no one knowing what to do, the offensive line getting gashed, Laviano scrambling, and getting sacked 18 yards behind the line of scrimmage. Nothing about any of the last few seconds game me any confidence that the WRs, linemen, or QB were going to be composed enough to make a good effort at a TD. Clearly there was a better chance of something happening than the spike, but I think we are looking at maybe a 1% shot at a TD there.Of course it's going to make the funny moment stuff. In the bigger picture , it was pretty meaningless...the clock was running ...would have been tough to even get the ball snapped and people down toward the goal line in my opinion. Much ado about nothing. MSU completed some really tough pass plays on key downs on that last drive..that's where the game was lost for RU.
Because theres was a somewhat ore common mistake - trying to stop the clock but not having enough time to do so. Ours was a once in a lifetime act of stupidity.But BC's spike with goal to go in the final seconds did not. Hmm....
Because theres was a somewhat ore common mistake - trying to stop the clock but not having enough time to do so. Ours was a once in a lifetime act of stupidity.
I'll say this - the spike got much more negative attention for RU football outside of the RU sphere than all of the combined scandals of the past two months.
I assume you're joking.
Laviano would have had to throw a fairly accurate pass of 55-60 yards counting how far he'd drop back.
You'd have to assume the OL would have given him the time to wait for the WR's to get downfield.
2 WR's would have to beat 4 or more DBs for the ball.
I wouldn't call anything about that "reasonable".