Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was told they should get an at large. Losing to Brown badly?!
Not impressed with the ivyLook I’ll root for them. But cmon that conf is a joke when you look at the “grind” and mid to bottom.
Geo said that might not be a bad loss when we got blown outabsolutely not....send them to Villanova or Seton Hall for a NIT game
Well, coming into today it was considered a Q1 loss - but it'll drop down to Q2 for tomorrow.Geo said that might not be a bad loss when we got blown out
We lost by 7 points.Geo said that might not be a bad loss when we got blown out
At the end of the season Princeton would have easily defeated Rutgers bye double digits.We lost by 7 points.
I mean who wouldn't have?At the end of the season Princeton would have easily defeated Rutgers bye double digits.
Whatever you say pal, but it’s not particularly relevant. A seven point loss is not a blowout. People have abused that term until it’s lost all meaning.At the end of the season Princeton would have easily defeated Rutgers bye double digits.
We all know we had a losing season but our resident geniuses always find the need to make these irrelevant comparisons. Maybe we should point out that we beat Wisconsin, Nebraska, Seton Hall, Northwestern , Maryland and Indiana-- many of which will make the post season . Info that has as much relevance but at least it praises RU ? rather than attacks it. Some so called "fans" truly suck.Whatever you say pal, but it’s not particularly relevant. A seven point loss is not a blowout. People have abused that term until it’s lost all meaning.
SureAt the end of the season Princeton would have easily defeated Rutgers bye double digits.
Sure
Contrast our home game against Wisconsin versus Wisconsin today.
Wisconsin would beat us by 30 on a neutral court now,as well as beat us handily at the RAC now
The bottom fell out
Have to back you up on this one. Not sure it applies to our game vs. the Tigers but many game scores expand as teams foul to extend games that often inflate the scores. Besides under 10 isn't nearly a BO IMHO. Seen way too many games just this week alone where teams almost won down 10 with minutes to go.Whatever you say pal, but it’s not particularly relevant. A seven point loss is not a blowout. People have abused that term until it’s lost all meaning.
We played as if uninterested at the very end.Sure
Contrast our home game against Wisconsin versus Wisconsin today.
Wisconsin would beat us by 30 on a neutral court now,as well as beat us handily at the RAC now
The bottom fell out
Stonehill. They likely would have beat us, but probably not by double digits. 😂I mean who wouldn't have?
It was a mistake and won't happen again.It’s pretty clear that scheduling Princeton is pointless if in their best regular season in years they were a quad 2 loss that didn’t make the tourney. It’s also even more clear than before that we should be scheduling and destroying terrible Q4 teams OOC, or playing Q1 teams at neutral or away venues.
24-4 is a great record regardless whether it’s a bad conference.Not impressed with the ivy
No - it’s not that. Fans against this game want to set the schedule up in a way that best helps us on Selection Sunday if we need it. Scheduling one off neutral or road games against unlikely At Large teams just isn’t a good strategy.Fans don't want to play Princeton because they run a offense that Rutgers had difficulty defending for decades.If you want to be the best, then compete against all types of teams and show that you belong.Having easy out of conference games hasn't helped Rutgers compete in the B1G Ten.
Because their best wins were Yale, Duquesne, and Rutgers. If they were 24-4 with a 3-4 record in Q1 and a clean sheet in Q2-Q4, they'd have been an at large.Now why wouldn’t the committe take a team with a 24-4 record? Because it’s an ivy league team? And they get only 1 bid?
TyBecause their best wins were Yale, Duquesne, and Rutgers. If they were 24-4 with a 3-4 record in Q1 and a clean sheet in Q2-Q4, they'd have been an at large.
This . Play them and beat them.Never a bad loss. It’s Princeton.
Good win!
Sweet 16 last year.
24-4
Historic rivalry.
Local game
Meow for all the crying. Embarrassing.
It’s not a good win. It’s an “okay” win and not the kind of loss that gets overlooked with a high loss count on selection Sunday.Never a bad loss. It’s Princeton.
Good win!
Sweet 16 last year.
24-4
Historic rivalry.
Local game
Meow for all the crying. Embarrassing.
You are not getting penalized for losing to Princeton ever.It’s not a good win. It’s an “okay” win and not the kind of loss that gets overlooked with a high loss count on selection Sunday.
I’m not picking on Princeton. I don’t want Wake type home and homes on the schedule either. If we’re not playing in a preseason tourney (where your opponent in game 2 is adaptive based on what you do in game one) we should be targeting Wisconsin level teams for each of the 4 “real” games that we play. Beyond that - home games against Bryant and Howard types 130-250ish level teams (avoid 300s wherever possible).
You are not getting penalized for losing to Princeton ever.
And you guys beat Princeton when rest of country is afraid to play them.
Teaching moment to lower pace teams and back door teams.
Like the MW, it’s clear committee looks beyond number manipulation.