Agree with you.
While not my area of practice, I followed eminent domain cases, mainly those litigated by a libertarian pro-bono, non-profit law firm called the Institute for Justice, funded by one of the Koch brothers. IJ litigated the Kelo case on behalf of the property owners. Contrary to what many lay people may think, the conservative block of Justices (Justice O'Connor, joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Scalia and Thomas) dissented from the majority opinion, and the liberal block voted in favor of the use of eminent domain. The vote by the various members of the Supreme Court in the case may surprise a lot of people because the conservative block voted against the interests that are obviously in favor of big business, but is a good example of how it can be difficult to predict how the Supreme Court Justices may or may vote on a variety of issues. This is one reason why it may be difficult to paint a nominee to the Supreme Court into a corner as ruling a certain way on certain issues.