Many, since RU has no qualms about overpaying for mediocrity.Agreed that nobody should be hero worshipped. But "he's not the only person that can do it." Right, but how many of them would come to Rutgers?
Many, since RU has no qualms about overpaying for mediocrity.Agreed that nobody should be hero worshipped. But "he's not the only person that can do it." Right, but how many of them would come to Rutgers?
Regarding coaches, what would Notre Dame be without Knute Rockne?
A May 8, 1969 Targum article interviewed Rutgers athletes about the attitude of taking football and sports up to a higher level, “… our whole athletic department is full of men who are contented with second class and keeping Rutgers at the level with small private schools like Lehigh, Lafayette and Colgate,” chimed in one of the frustrated athletes. “It’s good for some of the young coaches like Jim Valvano to get out on their own, and it will only be time before we lose other good coaches like (swimming coach Frank) Elm, basketball coach Bill Foster and Frank Burns of the football team because of our stuffy policies.”
He's the closest to Schiano? A guy who brought a school from nowhere to the start of a decade of dominance in the sport is "close" to Schiano?Shellenburger at U of Miami is probably the closet one IMO
Thread is a joke!I greatly dislike this sort of adulation.
GS has been doing a good job so far in his second stint here. He deserves appreciation for his work. But he hasn’t won anything yet but some games.
And even if he takes the team to repeated national championships, it’s still just a coach doing a great job. He’s not the only person who can do it. Many other coaches have won championships at many other schools.
None of them, nor GS, should be hero-worshipped. It’s tacky and undignified. It’s always undignified to worship another human being. That’s what cults are made of and cults suck.
Greg Schiano is more important to Rutgers than John Wooden was the UCLA?Answer to question is No
people tend to forget things like you mentioned.I vividly remember all the 2008-12 calls to get rid of Schiano to "take the next step."
People were bored of mediocre bowls every year - then they learned
To be fair, the OP merely reposted an online article without commentary. And it’s not entirely without interest to RUFB fans.Thread is a joke!
nope when he left i was bummed big time. i knew things would change for the worse for a long time. i knew flood pretty well obviously and liked him but we knew he was not the guy. then Ash toll control and totally ran it into the ground. thank God greg is back.people tend to forget things like you mentioned.
Some just claim they never felt that way, it was others: not them.
I was sad to see Greg leave for the pros , but I wasn't very sad about it because I felt (by 2011) Schiano was the type of HC that would have a winning program every year , but not at the elite level I wanted.
So though I liked Greg as the HC, I felt to be among the best Rutgers needed a change.
Many complained about Greg's salary compared to production, I didn't think he was overpaid and felt he recruited the type of talent that could make RU an elite program , just thought his game-day skills wasn't good enough to make Rutgers an elite program .
The change came, but the administration cheeped out and it was back to the dumpster again .
Yes thankfully Greg is back.nope when he left i was bummed big time. i knew things would change for the worse for a long time. i knew flood pretty well obviously and liked him but we knew he was not the guy. then Ash toll control and totally ran it into the ground. thank God greg is back.
spot onYes thankfully Greg is back.
When Greg left I thought Rutgers would pay around what he was making to the new HC, but they went on the cheap and got what they paid for , ruining what Schiano built .
I put my feelings as Schiano gave me high expectations and fell a little short of what kind of program I came to expect RU to have , because of how Greg made it into a constant winner starting in 2005.
By 20O9 I expected a BCS bowl team and when Greg left I thought Rutgers would bring in someone who would do what Greg failed to accomplish.
Flood was able to use Schanio's players to win , but as they left you could see the drop in overal talent he was bringing in.
Ash was a Terry Shea type disaster
Bowden was my first thought. I went back and took a look. The 3 years before he arrived, FSU was 0-11, 1-10, 3-8. This would be like Schiano taking over for Shea and eventually winning a couple national championships.sure schiano is up there
Osborne
Snyder
Schnellenberger
Bowden
Schembechler
Woody
Paterno (the cult is alive and well).
Dabo
The Schiano boot lickers would counter that FSU was in a much easier conference and that GS has done a better job than Bobby ever did just by getting to 6-6 last yearBowden was my first thought. I went back and took a look. The 3 years before he arrived, FSU was 0-11, 1-10, 3-8. This would be like Schiano taking over for Shea and eventually winning a couple national championships.
Schiano. Is. God. Oh wait that's a typo...I meant to say good. 😘I greatly dislike this sort of adulation.
GS has been doing a good job so far in his second stint here. He deserves appreciation for his work. But he hasn’t won anything yet but some games.
And even if he takes the team to repeated national championships, it’s still just a coach doing a great job. He’s not the only person who can do it. Many other coaches have won championships at many other schools.
None of them, nor GS, should be hero-worshipped. It’s tacky and undignified. It’s always undignified to worship another human being. That’s what cults are made of and cults suck.
schiano is a rutgers god no other way to say it. the country has taken notice. go RU.Schiano. Is. God. Oh wait that's a typo...I meant to say good. 😘
Can’t tell if you’re being serious. Or if joking or maybe trolling.schiano is a rutgers god no other way to say it. the country has taken notice. go RU.
Not joking or trolling , all serious . You can have your opinion from behind the keyboard .Can’t tell if you’re being serious. Or if joking or maybe trolling.
But in any event, no. He is not any kind of god.
Sure he is, to some. That’s the thing about gods, it’s a personal choice not restricted to the whimsical fantasies of countless cultures dating back thousands of years ago.Can’t tell if you’re being serious. Or if joking or maybe trolling.
But in any event, no. He is not any kind of god.
The country has taken notice? Really?schiano is a rutgers god no other way to say it. the country has taken notice. go RU.
So, like, are you gonna start praying to him? Will you do all he commands? Will you kneel before him?Not joking or trolling , all serious . You can have your opinion from behind the keyboard .
Many churches are forming all across the nation as we speak. The Church of Chop. The Sect of Sacred Scarlet Schianoism. The Later Day SchianoistsThe country has taken notice? Really?
The more important thing with Schnellenberger is that he created a winning infrastructure at Miami. They won multiple National Championships under different coaches after he left.He's the closest to Schiano? A guy who brought a school from nowhere to the start of a decade of dominance in the sport is "close" to Schiano?
I'm not even sure how Schiano is even in the discussion for the thread title. I think he's done a good job but the answer to the question is, "yes, there have been many".
A lot of Bowden's success at FSU was before they joined the ACC.The Schiano boot lickers would counter that FSU was in a much easier conference and that GS has done a better job than Bobby ever did just by getting to 6-6 last year
A lot of Bowden's success at FSU was before they joined the ACC.
FSU would have been a serious dynasty if Bowden could have recruited kickers.Does "wide right" ring a bell?
FSU would have been a serious dynasty if Bowden could have recruited kickers.The CanesThe Canes thrived on that expression
I thought the comparison was which coach had the biggest positive impact on a program. Both brought teams back from the dead. Howard had over all better results obviously, but both their impacts on their respective programs was the correlation I was making.He's the closest to Schiano? A guy who brought a school from nowhere to the start of a decade of dominance in the sport is "close" to Schiano?
I'm not even sure how Schiano is even in the discussion for the thread title. I think he's done a good job but the answer to the question is, "yes, there have been many".
I thought the comparison was which coach had the biggest positive impact on a program. Both brought teams back from the dead. Howard had over all better results obviously, but both their impacts on their respective programs was the correlation I was making.
he's only in the discussion because of the low standards and expectations here. We saw fan reaction at a big time program, Tennessee, when he (almost) got hired and when OSU chose someone with much less experience instead of him.He's the closest to Schiano? A guy who brought a school from nowhere to the start of a decade of dominance in the sport is "close" to Schiano?
I'm not even sure how Schiano is even in the discussion for the thread title. I think he's done a good job but the answer to the question is, "yes, there have been many".
That is extremely innaccurate. FSU joined the ACC in 1992 and went on about a 10 year run of dominating that conference. Prior to 1992, FSU was an independent and increasingly became a national player in the 1980s. The 1987 team was probably the most talented that year. Yet they lost to Miami at home 26 -25 after leading by 19 in the 3rd quarter. Their teams in the 1990s were off the charts, they won 2 NCs and probably should have won 4 NCs. They were the dominant program in the 1990s, followed closely by Nebraska.A lot of Bowden's success at FSU was before they joined the ACC.
👆👆👆Overreacting weirdo👆👆👆Struck a nerve, did I? Sorry, not sorry. 😉
One need only look at your signature to know why you object to someone saying cultish behavior is always bad.
He is kinda right though.. it is pretty weird at face value. The need to claim those admiring the job Schiano has done have issues.Struck a nerve, did I? Sorry, not sorry. 😉
One need only look at your signature to know why you object to someone saying cultish behavior is always bad.