http://www.campusrush.com/college-b...016-rick-pitino-1641474440.html?xid=cr_social
Interesting he has a UMich assistant on his list of candidates.
Interesting he has a UMich assistant on his list of candidates.
Seems like the Rutgers budget makes the decision who to pick,rather than going after the best.
very good coach - from Texas area - Oklahoma St will throw money at himInteresting to see how many time Buzz Williams' name came up in that article. Is he really looking to leave VTech so soon?
Rutgers does not need to hire a HC whose record is just about .500.RutgersDon
Please tell me what is wrong with Sendek?
He went to the NCAA five times in a row at North Carolina state. Any ACC program that can go the NCAA five times in a row with duke and UNC locks on an annual basis taking two bids is a really good coach
He has success at Arizona state. They were a bad pac12 team. They went to the tournament one time since beating us in 1991 before Sendek got there. They are so the little sister of Arizona basketball in their state and yet they were pretty respectable
The guy won 400 games as coach
Won head coach of the year at two different power five confrencesa
What is wrong with him
Rutgers does not need to hire a HC whose record is just about .500.
.
The names listed would not excite fans, recruits or donors because they are low budget and lack the cache to stop the futility .Unless a coach like Sendek is hired Rutgers might as well keep Jordan for another year .Its the lesser of two evils for a program that has no relevance in college basketball right now.Seems like the Rutgers budget makes the decision who to pick,rather than going after the best.
So, facilities or no, who do the recruiting gurus think gets a talent infusion sooner -- NY/NJ guy like Masiello or Rice OR. P5 outsider like Sendek.
Interesting to see Thamel mention Mick Cronin (makes $2.2 mill at Cinci) for one of the jobs. Ah, wishful thinking.
For comedy, the worst name I've seen mentioned for the job by a national writer is Dino Gaudio. Yes, in 3 years at Wake he was 17-13, 24-7 and 20-11, but he really underwhelmed with Skip Proesser's recruits. I think some guys just scan the ESPN roster and make stuff up.
Sendek is not coming here.
Opinion or give us something more. Thanks.
he and Pete Thamel should talk then. Somebody's got bad informationDont listen to him...he wants Eddie back and is on record saying there is a zero percent chance he is canned
The names listed would not excite fans, recruits or donors because they are low budget and lack the cache to stop the futility .Unless a coach like Sendek is hired Rutgers might as well keep Jordan for another year .Its the lesser of two evils for a program that has no relevance in college basketball right now.
Ford is ok by meAfter reading Thamel's article, it looks like Oklahoma State's Travis Ford, owed $10M if sent packing, might be Rutgers best value as a hire. While waiting for Rutgers Big Ten full membership money, he could get Rutgers back on track working for less than Big Ten coaching money. He has coached in the Northeast at UMass and succeeded.
100% agreeThe names listed would not excite fans, recruits or donors because they are low budget and lack the cache to stop the futility .Unless a coach like Sendek is hired Rutgers might as well keep Jordan for another year .Its the lesser of two evils for a program that has no relevance in college basketball right now.
1984 and RUJMM78 ... Just curious. Do you pay for season tickets and parking tags?100% agree
1984 and RUJMM78 ... Just curious. Do you pay for season tickets and parking tags?
I think our buget for a new coach and staff is greater than assumed.
I think our buget for a new coach and staff is greater than assumed.
His 9 seasons at ASU he was 159-137 thats .537%If so good why did ASU fire him.?Nothing made up.Is the PAC 12 as tough as B-10?NoHis career win % is .586 Don but, as usual, you just go and make shit up! Also, when you take into account the FACT that he took over 3 programs that needed major overhauls, at the time, NEARLY .600 WIN % is something that nobody here at Rutgers should look upon without anything other than smiles, smiles, and more smiles!
Another way to put is not to hire a HC from the MAC or America East or an A-10 who is just over .500%.I like the idea of UMich assistant 7 years at Michigan and 3 at Iowa.that experience would be helpful .Don - exactly WHO do you think, better than the names we've talked about, would be available to come to Rutgers EVEN IF we had a lot more $$$?
Another way to put is not to hire a HC from the MAC or America East or an A-10 who is just over .500%.I like the idea of UMich assistant 7 years at Michigan and 3 at Iowa.that experience would be helpful .
Just to be clear the main reason I want Eddie back next season is because we would or will not be able to hire a component coach. I don't believe that anyone but Eddie is better like I did with Flood. It is a waste of money to buyout Eddie and hire ANY of the names that are being talked about. None of them will succeed without upgrades to facilities so we will be having the exact same conversation in 3 years and we will be out two million in buyout money for Eddie and then need another 2 million for the new guy. I would rather save the money on Eddies buyout and hope that by the end of next season we have a SET date on construction for the practice facility. We also then save 2 million dollars of buyout money on Eddie. Those two things would give us a chance to hire a good staff. That should be the plan. I also said that these last few blowouts might make that impossible to do which in the end is bad for us.Dont listen to him...he wants Eddie back and is on record saying there is a zero percent chance he is canned