How much will be left for football by the time the school gets a hold of it? Pennies?
Bitchin'.Meh. I attend games AND DVR them so I'm giving RU the best of both worlds.
I say, my good man. Is that a wee bit of Jersey snarkiness I detect? :)Bitchin'.
Nope. Just a wee bit of Jeff Spicoli-style support for a righteous approach to games.I say, my good man. Is that a wee bit of Jersey snarkiness I detect? :)
Or how about the Magoo Igloo?Here comes Rutgers ice hockey!!!!!!!!
They should call the facility "magoo ice center"
Even more than we previously thought.
All the know-nothing asshats that suggest RU leaves the conference can put this in their pipe and smoke it.
Our betters in the Legislature will decide what is needed and where...hell, we're not even allowed to borrow against the future windfall to get the stuff needed now...
Those who think that the payout will be spent exclusively on athletics are delusional. That is going to be university money that will be used to improve not only New Brunswick,but Newark and Camden as well. And don't ever forget that wa live in New Jersey......Trenton and its merry band of thieves are salivating in anticipation of getting their hands on that money.
Oooh, good movie character reference.Nope. Just a wee bit of Jeff Spicoli-style support for a righteous approach to games.
Magoo Igloo is awesomeNot the ice hockey talk again.
This has already been covered, the money will ONLY be used by the AD in New Brunswick.
At best the money currently being used to subsidized the AD in New Brunswick can now be used for non sports related projects. As it SHOULD be.
The student fees will remain.I think there should be some subsidiary, just lower than it is now.
Make sure you form an S corp with RU ice hockey named as a partner so when you win, RU doesn't have to pay any gift tax. Gotta think ahead with this stuff. [laughing]Magoo Igloo is awesome
Cali, Don't sweat it, I've been playing the powerball, I will personally finance 50%, by 2026, ground will be broken
This will help us when competing with schools outside of the conference, but just adds to the arms race intra-conference- and we're way behind there.
I think there should be some subsidiary, just lower than it is now.
The NFL lost a ton of people because of the Anthem circus. I have friends who swore that they will never watch pro football again just because of it. Long term, who knows. But it is a huge short term hit because the league is hurting big-time in the perception game with tens of millions of their former fans.
The NFL lost a ton of people because of the Anthem circus. I have friends who swore that they will never watch pro football again just because of it. Long term, who knows. But it is a huge short term hit because the league is hurting big-time in the perception game with tens of millions of their former fans.
Imagine how boring the NFL is to someone who isn't into fantasy sports.I've watched - MAYBE - 1 quarter of non-Giants NFL football thus far and don't think that trend will change at all. If I'm not at a bar, watching multiple games at a time and keeping up on my fantasy scores, I'm hard-pressed to put a game on tv. Boring, predictable, too many freakin' TO's, and now the rest of the nonsense.
Imagine how boring the NFL is to someone who isn't into fantasy sports.
I believe Iowa stated that the Big Ten future contract was agreed to but not signed yet.Just for clarification, the $54MM is an estimate by the University of Iowa. The currently negotiated TV contract does not go out that far, so this is just speculation on Iowa's part. Also, the $54MM is conference distributions, not just TV money. It includes TV money (both BTN and network), plus bowl money, NCAA money, and other conference revenues.
The student fees will remain.
The rest if the funding from the General Budget to Athletics will go away.
(I refuse to use the word "subsidy" on this topic. Not unless we discuss the subsidy the school gives to the French Literature Dept., etc. in those terms as well)
I believe Iowa stated that the Big Ten future contract was agreed to but not signed yet.
hell, we're not even allowed to borrow against the future windfall to get the stuff needed now...
when more money comes in:
- continue to pay down the stadium debt
- invest in the basketball arena upgrade
- invest in non-revenue sports
- invest in academic support related to sports
- invest in new dorms for athletes / new dining hall for athletes
Facilities needed:
- Hoops practice facility ($15-$30 mil)
- RAC upgrades - Hoops and Wrestling will be here ($30-50 mil)
- replace old seating with newer comfy seats, add clubs, add video boards, possible expansion)
- Volleyball / Gymnastics meet facility that can also be used for smaller wrestling matches ($5-$20 mil)
- possibly can be an extension of the RAC where 3-5k fans can enjoy our indoor teams that draw less
- upgraded practice and training facilities for non-revenue sports ($2-$10 mil)
- this is a continual challenge to find space for non-revenue sports to train.
- continue to invest in the baseball / softball practice facility initially around $3.5 mil (additional $2- $5 mil)
total potential facility upgrades are: $54 mil to $115 mil
Witnessed this same conversation (I believe) with an involved law alumnus and t head of legacy giving/co-tailgate head during the Iowa game. If I am right:
1) I bELieve that money has to be used for RU Football/ RU sports.
2) The state cannot directly take that money.
3) Though #2, Christie or the governor can decrease that amount from RU in the budget.
This was done purposely. Remember that Rutgers did not do what Maryland did, which is take a huge chuck in the beginning, but will get significantly less by the time they vest.
What we did was very smart and fiscally sound. We are still currently making 5 times more than we would have in the AAC's old contract
Agreed that marylands seek was better if it was money to spend on upgrades in facilities or coaching. Problem for them is it all went to fund their ACC buyout.I thought MD took lots up front driven by the ACC buyout. Not facilities investment.
Last I saw RU got around $12-15mm? and it wasn't more than a couple mil > what they last got in the AAC. We are nowhere near making 5x what we were making.
2021, yeah. Now? no way.
You think taking an extra $10mm+$10mm+$10mm+$5mm+$5mm a year the first 5 years would be foolish because you'd only get $40/$40/$40/$45/$45 down the road?
not me.
The TV bundle may be getting chipped at but it is not going to die that quickly.People still may have to pay for internet access, but the Big Ten isn't getting automatic sub fees from that like they do from cable providers. May turn out being a subscription service to BTN one day, similar to HBOGO, Netflix, etc.
Agreed that marylands seek was better if it was money to spend on upgrades in facilities or coaching. Problem for them is it all went to fund their ACC buyout.
As far as what we WERE making our last year in the AAC, it's not relevant. Had we stayed in that conference we would be getting about 3 Million a year now. Think about that.
We were saved by our "bad" deal with the B1G.
just saying you can't compare our current conference payout to what we used to get, when the current day alternative is so much less.with all due respect... that's not even close to the point I was making...and I have no idea why you are responding with these comments. I specifically noted what MD spent their $ on and I never said it was a bad deal to be in the B1G.