ADVERTISEMENT

Already picked last for next year by BTN

My hope is there is more freedom to take a good look earlier in the shot clock that others would not take.

I don’t think there was that last year and it had nothing to do with the coaching staff....and little to do with Sanders.
 
It’s smart to limit possessions and shorten the game when the other team has more talent. This is particularly true when a team has trouble scoring and has no shooters. Our defense kept us in a lot games.

Every single B1G team had more talent than us this year and probably will next year as well.

I have no problem with our strategy of slowing the game down. However, we often waited too long and relied on a Sanders one-on-one, a forced shot, or both.

The keys to any changes in this program is recruiting, recruiting, and more recruiting. Pikiel is under the gun here in the next few weeks and I’m still hopeful he can work some magic. If it doesn’t pick up, we’ll be spinning our wheels in last place for a quite a while.
 
It’s smart to limit possessions and shorten the game when the other team has more talent. This is particularly true when a team has trouble scoring and has no shooters. Our defense kept us in a lot games.

Every single B1G team had more talent than us this year and probably will next year as well.

I have no problem with our strategy of slowing the game down. However, we often waited too long and relied on a Sanders one-on-one, a forced shot, or both.

The keys to any changes in this program is recruiting, recruiting, and more recruiting. Pikiel is under the gun here in the next few weeks and I’m still hopeful he can work some magic. If it doesn’t pick up, we’ll be spinning our wheels in last place for a quite a while.
Yes,recruiting higher level talent is the answer to future team success.The same comment could have been stated for past coaching staffs.Winning with lower level talent in a power conference has been a bad strategy but a reality as top tier recruits continue to choose other schools.
 
This years team will have two 4-star players in Doucoure and Mathis and a bunch of 3-star players in Baker, Harper, Carter, Johnson and Thiam. And they'll play with one of the best home court advantages in the country.

Picking Rutgers to finish last is a cope out. A lazy man's way of predicting the B1G.

I'm betting Rutgers finishes ahead of Northwestern, Illinois, Minnesota and Iowa.
 
I could see RU making some noise if they get a quick, decent shooting PG, whom commands the offense, and a catch-and-shoot SG or SF. Maybe not a lot of noise, but hopefully out of the basement. The defense is there, and as seen in the tournament/MSU/PU, if the offense also shows up, well, RU can compete with the better teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IMARUFAN
and we'll continue to be picked last until we demonstrate otherwise. the so-called pundits and others in media, etc will see RU only won 3 Big 10 games and lost 2 key players. they may think we are improving, but not at the same rate or pace as others in the league. only the Iowa win was comfortable--the other 2 wins we had to come back and scratch and claw...
recruiting-wise, I'd still consider using 1 of the 3 ships on a transfer who has to sit out a season...maybe someone who did well at a mid- or low-major, if not someone who was a legit prospect out of HS but is not playing at a high major...transfers IMO is how we can accelerate our process...
 
Threads like this irritate a segment of the fan base who don't want to hear bad news even if its based on factual data.After decades of futility, fan focus really should be on demanding a sense of urgency to changing last place results and then there would be no reason to have this thread.
 
What good does a pre-season selection do in early April...

A) When nobody has a roster set in stone and the spring signing period just started and ends in another month??

B) Assistant coaches across the country and in the conference may be transitioning to new jobs, which could impact the strengths or weaknesses of a staff and future recruiting classes??

C) Kids that have declared for the draft, may or may not keep their names in the draft??

D) Grad transfer eligible players are more than a month away from graduation and trying to figure out whether to stay with their current school or find new ones.

E) Kids that can verbally commit for 2019, could decide to reclassify back to 2018.

I will say this for the fans that keep saying "the recruiting isn't good enough".......Consider this item, which isn't 100% off the table.

Doucoure (top 150-175 ranked kid) .

Mathis (top 90-125 kid).

McConnell (visiting this weekend, currently around 175).

Aundre Hyatt (heavy interest with prior mention of a potential reclassification to 2018, while unlikely, the door is not 100% closed....another Top 100-125 kid).

On some "rankings" if Doucoure stayed in his reclassified class of 2018 and RU was fortunate enough to land McConnell AND Hyatt, you would have 4 kids considered in the Top 175,-200 range based on their rankings (two Top 100-125 kids and 2 Top 175 type of players).....I don't get into calculations, but that would likely be a legitimate class not typically seen at RU.

While this doesn't change the "RU is picked last again", even if you subtract Hyatt from the 2018 equation, 3 Top 175 players is not something atypical for B1G programs, BUT it's not a typical recruiting class that RU has enjoyed in any consistent fashion.

If I extend that to adding 2 Top 175 caliber players for 2019 (whether that is Hyatt/Mulcahy/Massoud or countless others that are in that range being recruited by RU), it would add 2 more "B1G" caliber contributors.....Or 6 Top 175 kids over 2 classes....that's pretty solid if you ask me.....not great, but not what RU has done over a 3-4 year stretch.

This is not counting the brutally underrated status of Geo Baker being north of 400+ on some rankings for 2017....not counting a somewhat unknown, but somewhat of a wild card in Ron Harper Jr......and not involving the JUCO contributions/rankings of Shaq Carter, considered a Top 10 -15 JUCO recruit......And we have some potential down the road for a Myles Johnson, who was wisely redshirted.

Again, this doesn't mean RU is doing anything super in relation to the rest of the B1G, the fact remains, this just allows RU to close the gap that was enormously wide between RU and other programs in the conference and most Power 5 programs.....AND usually 1 out of 3 recruits don't always develop at the same pace and could get recruited over or transfer out, whether that's at RU or any other school, so just because all of these kids are here, means they are all destined to be difference makers....

It just points out that RU on paper doesn't warrant being selected any higher right now.....Every program for decades has been recruiting players at the level RU is just getting started with now, so they have developed players and refined their rotations/rosters/staffs etc.........RU is still stockpiling/sorting out things....

Complaining about RU not recruiting better, probably isn't an argument that can be applied here, or at least is a stale argument down the road.....It will be a few years of not finishing last and a clear separation that needs to gradually happen from last place, to avoid that mindset, not for the program or current coaches, but a lot of fans here are stuck in a rut..........The goal for some fans seems to be an assumption that once you go from 14th to 12th or 11th, that it's going to change minds across the league....that could have happened this past year and RU would have still been picked 14th for next season..........It's taken Penn State until now, in Year 7 for their rebuild under Pat Chambers, to likely avoid being picked last.....Pike is starting Year 3 OR "Year 1", dependent on viewpoint.

The goal is to not make a random run to a NIT/NCAA bubble level, only to tumble back down to 13th or 14th.....this had to be built in a patient/methodical way to ensure the new floor for the program isn't 13th or 14th, but 9th or 10th or 11th, with a goal of being a 20 win program most seasons.....
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GoFish2
This years team will have two 4-star players in Doucoure and Mathis and a bunch of 3-star players in Baker, Harper, Carter, Johnson and Thiam. And they'll play with one of the best home court advantages in the country.

Picking Rutgers to finish last is a cope out. A lazy man's way of predicting the B1G.

I'm betting Rutgers finishes ahead of Northwestern, Illinois, Minnesota and Iowa.
No chance we finish higher than NW, Iowa, or Illinois. I'll take that bet, if for no other reason than easy money.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT