and the question comes here because the football world handles this issue so well?
Graduation speeches often if not always contain unnecessary personal side stories. Usually they help pull together a larger point that is very relevant to the situation. I'm sure some version of the speech will be available online in a few days and we can all see how horribly salacious this was, or not.
I'm not sure what the school accomplished. At a minimum, in some way they should have recognized the valedictorian - the person that won the game, and up to that point, followed all the necessary rules. The fact that the district has their lawyer and PR people out in front of this makes me think the people who made the decision are at a minimum very concerned about the perception of their actions.
Graduation speeches often if not always contain unnecessary personal side stories. Usually they help pull together a larger point that is very relevant to the situation. I'm sure some version of the speech will be available online in a few days and we can all see how horribly salacious this was, or not.
I'm not sure what the school accomplished. At a minimum, in some way they should have recognized the valedictorian - the person that won the game, and up to that point, followed all the necessary rules. The fact that the district has their lawyer and PR people out in front of this makes me think the people who made the decision are at a minimum very concerned about the perception of their actions.